Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical accuracy in the diagnosis of small polyps using the flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscope

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Seventy-eight patients referred to a specialist clinic for investigation of large-bowel symptoms were examined with the flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscope. One hundred twenty polyps were treated, including 84 adenomatous and 32 hyperplastic polyps. Sixty-nine per cent of polyps were situated beyond 18 cm from the anal verge. Endoscopic diagnosis was correct in 82 per cent of cases. The size of the polyp assessed endoscopically strongly influenced the clinical diagnosis but proved unreliable as a means of making an accurate diagnosis. Results indicate that whenever possible all polyps of all sizes should be removed for microscopic examinations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morson BC. Some peculiarities in the histology of intestinal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 1962;5:337–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Estrada RG, Spjut HJ. Hyperplastic polyps of the large bowel. Am J Surg Pathol 1980;4:127–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams GT, Arthur JF, Bussey HJR, Morson BC. Metaplastic polyps and polyposis of the colorectum. Histopathology 1980;4:155–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Granqvist S, Gabrielsson N, Sundelin P. Diminutive colonic polyps—Clinical significance and management. Endoscopy 1979;11:36–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chapuis PH, Goulston KJ, Pheils MT. Screening of patients after surgery for colorectal carcinoma: Value of faecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Med J Aust 1980;1:538–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams CB. Diathermy-biopsy—a technique for the endoscopic management of small polyps. Endoscopy 1973;5:215–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nie NH, Hull CH, Jenkins JG, Steinberenner K, Bent DH, Statistical package for the social sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bohlman TW, Katon RM, Lipshutz GR, McCool MF, Smith FW, Melnyk CS. Fiberotic pansigmoidoscoy—an evaluation and comparison with rigid sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 1977;72:644–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Williams CB, Hunt RH, Loose H, Riddell RH, Sakai Y, Swarbrick ET. Colonoscopy in the management of colon polyps. Br J Surg 1974;61:673–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shinya H, Wolff WI. Morphology, anatomic distribution and cancer potential of colonic polyps: An analysis of 7,000 polyps endoscopically removed. Ann Surg 1979;190:679–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Muto T, Kamiya J, Sawada T,et al.. Colonoscopic polypectomy in diagnosis and treatment of early carcinoma of the large intestine. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:68–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by grants from the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, the University of Sydney Cancer Research Fund, and the New South Wales Cancer Council.

About this article

Cite this article

Chapuis, P.H., Dent, O.F. & Goulston, K.J. Clinical accuracy in the diagnosis of small polyps using the flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscope. Dis Colon Rectum 25, 669–672 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02629538

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02629538

Key words

Navigation