Skip to main content
Log in

Established cell lines from different groups of vertebrates undergo metabolic cooperation with one another

  • Published:
In Vitro Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The prelabeled-donor technique was used to study metabolic cooperation in the established cell lines, RTG-2, FHM, and IgH-2, which are respectively from rainbow trout, fathead minnow, and green iguana. The donors were grown with [3H]hypoxanthine for 3 h after which the radioactive medium was removed and the recipients, marked by the presence of latex beads, were added. Cells from each of these lines were capable of cooperating with themselves and with one another because after 5.5 h the recipients in contact with donors were more significantly labeled than those that were not in contact. Cells FHM and IgH-2 were grown with HGPRT Chinese hamster fibroblasts, CHW-1102, in the presence of [3H]hypoxanthine. In all cases the CHW-1102 cells that were in contact with the non-mammalian cells were more heavily labeled than those that were not in contact. Thus cells from a fish and a reptile undergo metabolic cooperation with cells from a mammal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Loewenstein, W. R. Junctional intercellular communication: the cell-to-cell membrane channel. Physiol. Rev. 61: 829–913; 1981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Peracchia, C. Structural correlates of gap junction permeation. Bourne, G. H.; Danielli, J. F. eds. International review of cytology. Vol. 66. New York: Academic Press; 1980: 81–146.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gilula, N. B.; Reeves, O. R.; Satir, P. Metabolic coupling, ionic coupling, and cell contacts. Nature 235: 262–265; 1972.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pederson, D. C.; Sheridan, J. D.; Johnson, R. G. The development of metabolite transfer between reaggregating Novikoff Hepatoma cells. Exp. Cell Res. 127: 159–177; 1980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Michalke, W.; Loewenstein, W. R. Communication between cells of different type. Nature 232: 121–122; 1971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Epstein, M. L.; Gilula, N. B. A study of communication specificity between cells in culture. J. Cell Biol. 75: 769–787; 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hooper, M. L.; Subak-Sharpe, J. H. Metabolic cooperation between cells. Bourne, G. H.; Danielli, J. F. eds. International review of cytology. Vol. 69. New York: Academic Press; 1981: 45–104.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Subak-Sharpe, J. H.; Burk, R. R.; Pitts, J. P. Metabolic co-operation by cell-to-cell transfer between genetically different mammalian cells in tissue culture (abstr.). Heredity 21: 342; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pitts, J. D.; Simms, J.W. Permeability of junctions between animal cells: intercellular transfer of nucleotides but not macromolecules. Exp. Cell Res. 104: 153–163; 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolf, K.; Quimby, M. C. Established eurythermic line of fish cells in vitro. Science 135: 1065–1066; 1962.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gravell, M.; Malsberger, R. G. A permanent cell line from the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 126: 555–565; 1965.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark, H. F.; Cohen, M. M.; Karzon, D. T. Characterization of reptilian cell lines established at incubation temperatures of 23 to 36°C. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 133: 1039–1047; 1970.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, C. C.; Chang, T. D.; Niewczas-Late, V. The establishment of chromosome analysis of a new cell line of Chinese hamster from spontaneous transformationin vitro. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 13: 4–13; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ford, D. K.; Yerganian, G. Observations on the chromosomes of Chinese hamster cells in tissue culture. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 21: 393–425; 1958.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bols, N. C.; Mosser, D. D. Separation by thinlayer chromatography of nucleotides from bases and nucleosides in trichloroacetic acid extracts of cells. J. Chromatogr. 229: 460–463; 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hilwig, I.; Gropp, A. pH-Dependent fluorescence of DNA and RNA in cytologic staining with “33258 Hoechst”. Exp. Cell Res. 91: 457–460; 1975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zar, J. H. Biostatistical analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1974: 109.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gaunt, S. J.; Subak-Sharpe, J. H. Selectivity in metabolic cooperation between cultured mammalian cells. Exp. Cell Res. 120: 307–320; 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, T. R. In situ detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures by fluorescent Hoescht H33258 stain. Exp. Cell.Res. 104: 255–262; 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas, M. A.; Shipman, C.; Sandberg, J. N.; Drach, J. C. Adenosine phosphorylase activity in a mutant HEp-2 cell line contaminated withMycoplasma hyorhinis. In Vitro 13: 502–509; 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Slack, C.; Morgan, H. M.; Hooper, M. L. Isolation of metabolic cooperation—defective variants from mouse embryonal carcinoma cells. Exp. Cell Res. 117: 195–205; 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hooper, M. L.; Perry, J. E. Incidence of gap junctions and microvilli in variant cell lines with altered capacity for metabolic co-operation. Exp. Cell Res. 128: 461–466; 1980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kelly, R. O.; Vogel, K. G.; Crissman, H. A.; Lujan, C. J.; Skipper, B. E. Development of the aging cell surface. Exp. Cell Res. 119: 127–143; 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yancey, S. B.; Edens, J. E.; Trosko, J. E.; Chang, C-C.; Revel, J-P. Decreased incidence of gap junctions between Chinese hamster V-79 cells upon exposure to the tumor promoter 12-0-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate. Exp. Cell Res. 139: 329–340; 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cox, R. P.; Krauss, M. R.; Balis, M. E.; Dancis, J. Studies on cell communication with enucleated human fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 71: 693–703; 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bols, N. C.; Ringertz, N. R. A study of metabolic cooperation with established myoblast cell lines. Exp. Cell Res. 120: 15–23; 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hunter, G. K.; Pitts, J. D. Non-selective junctional communication between some different mammalian cell types in primary culture. J. Cell Sci. 49: 163–175; 1981.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wolf, K.; Mann, J. A. Poikilotherm vertebrate cell lines and viruses: a current listing for fishes. In Vitro 16: 168–179; 1980.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wolf, K.; Quimby, M. C. Fish cell and tissue culture. Hoar, W. S.; Randall, D. F. eds. Fish physiology. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press; 1969: 253–305.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fentiman, I.; Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.; Stoker, M. Selective contact-dependent cell communication. Nature 264: 760–762; 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McKay, I. A.; Taylor-Papadimitriou, J. Junctional communication pattern of cells cultured from human milk. Exp. Cell Res. 134: 465–470; 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pitts, J. D.; Burk, R. R. Specificity of junctional communication between animal cells. Nature 264: 762–764; 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by a grant from the NSERC of Canada to NCB.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slater, M.A., Mosser, D.D. & Bols, N.C. Established cell lines from different groups of vertebrates undergo metabolic cooperation with one another. In Vitro 19, 683–692 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628959

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628959

Key words

Navigation