Skip to main content
Log in

A problem solving model for use in science student teacher supervision

  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

Conclusion

The period of time student teachers have to receive feedback from their supervisors and cooperating teachers is relatively short. Techniques and ideas suggested by university supervisors and cooperating teachers are clearly beneficial to beginning teachers, but the students also need direct experience in addressing classroom concerns themselves. Student teachers need to develop techniques for evaluating their own teaching and for solving instructional problems autonomously such as suggested through the use of this model. The problem solving model forces student teachers to take responsibility for their learning about teaching. It forces them to analyze and reflect on their own lessons and to deal with their own problems. Importantly, the model may serve as a tool for self-evaluation that can be used during students’ first few years of teaching and throughout their science teaching career.

Student teachers will still undergo the complex and sometimes overwhelming experience of teaching for the first time. However, by addressing each problem they face in a systematic, organized way, the experience may become more manageable, and success may seem more attainable for them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beineke, J. A. (1985). Critical thinking, teacher education, and national reports.Teacher Education Quarterly, 12(1), 80–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claudinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1984). Personal practical knowledge at Bay Street School: Ritual, personal philosophy and image. In R. Halkes & J. Olson (Eds.),Teacher thinking: A new perspective on persisting problems in education, (pp. 134–148). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. M. (1988). Asking the right question about teacher preparation: Contributions of research on teacher thinking.Educational Researcher, 17(2), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. M., & Lampert M. (1986). The study of teacher thinking: Implications for teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education, 37(5), 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, F. M., & Claudinin, D.J. (1987). On narrative method, biography and narrative unities in the study of teaching.Journal of Educational Thought, 21, 130–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, D. R., & Applegate, J. H. (1981). Reflective teaching as a strategy for teacher growth.Educational Leadership, 38, 553–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanders, N. (1976). Research on teaching and improving teaching.British Journal of Teacher Education, 2(2), 169–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedenberg, E. (1973). Critiques of current practice. In D. McCarty & Associates (Eds.),New perspectives on teacher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, D., Sherwood, R. D., & Enochs L. (1984). Problem solving skills of high school chemistry students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(2), 221–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glassberg, S., & Sprinthall, N., (1980). Student teaching: A developmental approach.Journal of Teacher Education, 31(2), 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, V. (1985). Research on pre-service teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice.Harvard Educational Review, 55, 178–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Loughlin, M. (1992). Engaging teachers in emancipatory knowledge construction.Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 336–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renner, J., & Marek, E. (1990). An educational theory base for science teaching.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(3), 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. B. (1991). A reflective approach to science methods courses for preservice elementary teachers.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1984). Its harder to teach in class than to be a physician.Stanford School of Education News, p. 3.

  • Shymansky, J. A. (1992). Using constructivist ideas to teach science teachers about constructivist ideas, or teachers are students too!Journal of Science Teacher Education, 3(2), 53–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silberman, C. (1970).Crisis in the classroom. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, R., & Anderson N. (1981).Science, students, and schools. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, A. (1984). Conflicts in consciousness: Imperative cognition can lead to knots in thinking. In R. Halkes & J. Olson (Eds.),Teacher thinking: A new perspective on persisting problems in education, (pp. 163–175). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Cavallo, A.M.L., Tice, C.J. A problem solving model for use in science student teacher supervision. J Sci Teacher Educ 4, 18–23 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628853

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628853

Keywords

Navigation