Skip to main content
Log in

Calorimetric and thermodynamic analysis of palladium-deuterium electrochemical cells

  • Special Issue: U.S. Department of Energy Workshop on Cold Fusion Phenomena. Part I
  • Published:
Journal of Fusion Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analysis is made of the chemical heats liberated from a palladium-deuterium electrochemical cell operating inside a calorimeter. It is important, in such an analysis, to carefully identify the chemical and electrochemical sources of heat, before any “excess heats” can be ascribed to non-chemical reactions.(1) The calorimeter measures the enthalpy (ΔH r ) of the reaction; whereas, the electrochemical voltage of the cell reflects the free energy (ΔG r ) of the reaction within the Pd-D electrolysis cell. The heat energy from the calorimeter cell therefore doesnot equal the electrical energy supplied to the cell, as might initially be expected. The magnitudes of the differing calorimetric and electrochemical energies were found to be related through the “thermoneutral potential” (ξH) of the electrochemical reaction. The chemical heat theoretically expected from the calorimeter is given by (1) I(ξLH), the cell current (I), multiplied by the difference between the operating cell voltage (ξL) and the thermoneutral potential (ξH), rather than (2) IξL, the electrical input power. This was verified empirically using a freon vaporization calorimeter, which operates on the principle of accurate measurement of the vaporization rate of liquid freon which completely surrounds the electrochemical cell. The calorimetrically-measured heats observed from a Pt/D2O, 0.1M LiOD/Pd electrochemical cell were within 2% of the thermoneutral potential predicted value, I(ξLH); but were found to be 15–30% less than the electrical work supplied to the cell, IξL. Measurements of D2O consumed by the cell reactions also verified that essentially no significant recombination of D2 and O2 gases occurred within the cell. No “excess heats” were observed from this Pd cell during the 36 days of its electrolytic operation. Likewise, no increase in the neutron flux around the cell was found, using three3He radiation detectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Fleischmann and S. Pons, and M. Hawkins, (1989).J Electroanal. Chem.,261, 301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. F. Gibbard (1978).J. Electrochem. Soc.,125, 353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. N. A. Godshall and J. R. Driscoll (1984).J. Electrochem. Soc.,131, 2221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Wagner and W. Schottky, (1930).Z. Phys. Chem.,Bll, 163; (1933). B21, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. R. Lide, Jr., ed. (1982).J. Phys Chem. ll (Suppl. no. 2).

  6. T. B. Flanagan (1961).J. Phys. Chem.,65, 280.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. M. Nace and J. G. Aston (1957).J. Am Chem. Soc.,79, 3619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. M. Nace and J. G. Aston (1957).J. Am. Chem. Soc.,79, 3623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. M. Nace and J. G. Aston (1957).J. Am. Chem. Soc.,79, 3627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Schuldiner and J. P. Hoare (1958).J. Electrochem. Soc.,105, 278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. I. Ewing, M. A. Butler, J. E. Schirber, and D. S. Ginley.Fusion Technol. (submitted).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godshall, N.A., Roth, E.P., Kelly, M.J. et al. Calorimetric and thermodynamic analysis of palladium-deuterium electrochemical cells. J Fusion Energ 9, 229–237 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02627590

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02627590

Keywords

Navigation