Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Results of treatment for rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Fifty-six patients were treated for rectal prolapse or incontinence. Rectal prolapse was present in 32 patients and was associated with fecal incontinence in 24 (75 per cent). Incontinence without prolapse was present in 24 patients, 12 of whom were less than 40 years old. Rectopexy was used for treatment of rectal prolapse. Surgical treatment of fecal incontinence was by post-anal repair; external sphincter reconstruction and surgery was advised only if control of diarrhea and electrical therapy had been of no benefit. Rectopexy was completely successful at controlling rectal prolapse in all cases, and only four of the 20 (20 per cent) patients with incontinence and prolapse remained incontinent after rectopexy alone. Incontinence was completely controlled by postanal repair in 58 per cent of patients and by external sphincter repair alone or in combination with postanal repair in 67 per cent. Using a combination of therapies 45 of 48 patients who were initially incontinent were improved (94 per cent), and 42 of the patients have complete control of defecation (87 per cent).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wells C. New operation for rectal prolapse. Proc R Soc Med 1959;52:602–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ripstein CB. Surgical cure of massive rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1965;8:34–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hopkinson BR, Hardman J. Silicone rubber perianal suture for rectal prolapse. Proc R Soc Med 1973;66:1095–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hopkinson BR, Lightwood R. Electrical treatment of anal incontinence. Lancet 1966;1:297–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Parks AG. Anorectal incontinence. Proc R Soc Med 1975;68:681–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hancock BD. Measurement of anal pressure and motility. Gut 1976;17:645–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Morgan CN, Porter NH, Klugman DJ. Ivalon (polyvinyl alcohol) sponge in the repair of complete rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1972;59:841–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Penfold JC, Hawley PR. Experience of Ivalon-sponge implant for complete rectal prolapse at St. Mark's Hospital. 1960–70. Br J Surg 1972;59:846–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gordon PH, Hoexter B. Complications of the Ripstein procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1978;21:277–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Keighley MR, Makuria T, Alexander-Williams J, Arabi Y. Clinical and manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and incontinence. Br J Surg 1980;67:54–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Keighley, M.R.B., Matheson, D.M. Results of treatment for rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 24, 449–453 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02626780

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02626780

Key words

Navigation