Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endoskopische karpaltunnelspaltung

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release

  • Originalarbeiten
  • Published:
Acta Chirurgica Austriaca Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Grundlagen

Obwohl die endoskopische Karpaltunnelspaltung seit mehr als 5 Jahren angewandt wird, bestehen nach wie vor kontroversielle Ansichten bezüglich der Effektivität und Sicherheit dieser Technik.

Methodik

An Hand eigener Erfahrungen mit 157 endoskopischen Karpaltunnelspaltungen und nach Durchsicht der Literatur wird der aktuelle Stellenwert der endoskopischen Karpaltunnelspaltung im Vergleich zur konventionellen offenen Methode erörtet.

Ergebnisse

Die Vorteile der endoskopischen Karpaltunnelspaltung gegenüber der konventionellen Methode bestehen primär in der frühen postoperativen Phase und äußern sich in geringeren Wund-und Narbenschmerzen sowie einer rascheren Wiedererlangung der Funktionalität. Allerdings erfordert diese Technik ausreichende Übung und handchirurgische Erfahrung, da das Risiko einer iatrogenen Verletzung der Gefäß-und Nervenstrukturen besonders in der Karpaltunnelspaltung.

Schlußfolgerungen

Die endoskopische Karpaltunnelspaltung stellt bei entsprechender Indikationsstellung eine wertvolle Ergänzung zur konventionellen offenen Methode dar. Der Patient muß über das mögliche Komplikationsrisiko aufgeklärt und soll in die Wahl der Operationsmethode mit einbezogen werden.

Summary

Background

Although the endoscopic carpal tunnel release has been in use since 1989 there is still considerable disagreement regarding the safety and efficacy of this procedure.

Methods

By means of our own experience with 157 endoscopic carpal tunnel procedures and guided by the literature the value of the endoscopic carpal tunnel procedure compared to the conventional open method will be discussed in detail.

Results

The advantages of the endoscopic carpal tunnel release over the standard open technique are evident in the early post-operative period and become apparent in less scar tenderness and an earlier functional recovery. However, the endoscopic carpal tunnel release is a technical demanding procedure and the risk of inadvertent damage to the neurovascular structures always remains a possibility.

Conclusions

Although the endoscopic carpal tunnel procedure has advantages over the standard open release this technique is not suitable for every patient and every surgeon. Early conversion to an open technique is recommendable whenever the transverse fibers of the flexor retinaculum are not clearly seen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Agee JM, McCarrol HR Jr, Tortosa RD, Berry DA, Stabo RM, Peimer CA: Endoscopic release of the carpal tunnel: a randomized prospective multicenter study. J Hand Surg, 1992;17A:987–995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arner M, Hagberg L, Rosen B: Sensory disturbances after two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a preliminary report. J Hand Surg 1994;19A:548–551.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bande S, De Smet L, Fabry G: The results of carpal tunnel release: open versus endoscopic technique. J Hand Surg 1994;19B:14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baranowski D, Klein W, Grünert J: Revisionsoperationen beim Karpaltunnelsyndrom. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 1992;25:127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bromley GS: Minimal-incision open carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg 1994;19A:119–120.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown AR, Geiberman RH, Seiler JG, Abrahamsson SO, Weiland AJ, Urbaniak JR et al: Carpal tunnel release. J Bone Joint Surg 1993;75A:1265–1275.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brown MG, Keyser B, Rothenberg ES: Endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg 1992;17A:1009–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown MG, Rothenberg ES, Keyser B, Woloszyn TT, Wolford A: results of 1236 endoscopic carpal tunnel release procedures using the Brown technique. Contemp Orthop 1993;27:163–169.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carroll RE, Green DP: The significance of the palmar cutaneous nerve at the wrist. Clin Orthop 1972;83:24–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cartotto RC, McCabe S, Mackinnon SE: Two devastating complications of carpal tunnel surgery. Ann Plast Surg 1992;28:472–474.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chow JCY: Endoscopic release of the carpal ligament for carpal tunnel syndrome: 22-month clinical result. Arthroscopy 1990;6:288–296.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chow JCY: Endoscopic release of the carpal ligament: a new technique for carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthroscopy 1989;5:19–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chow JCY: The Chow technique of endoscopic release of the carpal ligament for carpal tunnel syndrome: four years of clinical results. Arthroscopy 1993;9:301–314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cobb TK, Dalley BK, Posteraro RH, Lewis RC: Anatomy of the flexor retinaculum. J Hand Surg 1993;18A:91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cook AC, Szabo RM, Birkholz SW, King EF: Early mobilization following carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg 1995;20B:228–230.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Davlin LB, Aulicino PL, Bergfield TL: Anatomical variations of the median nerve at the wrist. Orthopaedic Rev 1992;57:955–959.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davlin LB, Aulicino PL, Bergfield TL: Sensory neural loop of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel. J Hand Surg 1991;16A:863–865.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Engber WD, Gmeiner JG: Palmar cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve. J Hand Surg 1980;11:26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Erdman MWH: Endoscopic carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg 1994;19B:5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Evans D (ed): Endoscopic carpal tunnel release-the hand doctor's dilemma. Br J Hand Surg 1994;19B:3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Feinstein PA: Endoscopic carpal tunnel release in a community-based series. J Hand Surg 1993;18A:451–454.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gelberman RH, Pfeffer GB, Galbraith RT, Szabo RM, Rydevik B, Dimick M: Results of treatment of severe carpal-tunnel syndrome without internal neurolysis of the median nerve. J Bone Joint Surg 1987;69A:896–903.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Goto S, Kojima T: An anomalous lumbrical muscle with an independent muscle belly associated with carpal tunnel syndrome. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 1993;25:72–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kelly CP, Pulisetti D, Jamieson AM: Early experience with the endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg 1994;19B:18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kerr CD, Sybert DR, Albarracin NS, An analysis of the flexor synovium in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: report of 625 cases. J Hand Surg 1992;17A:1028–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kulick MI, Gordillo G, Javidi T, Kilgore ES, Newmeyer WL: Long-term analysis of patients having surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 1986;11A:59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lee DH, Masear VR, Meyer RD, Stevens DM, Colgin S: Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg 1992;17A:1003–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Levy HL, Soifer TB, Kleinbart FA, Lemac LJ, Bryk E Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: An anatomic study. Arthroscopy 1993;9:1–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lowry WE, Follender AB: Interfascicular neurolysis in the severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Orthop 1988;227:251–254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. MacDonald RI, Lichtman DM, Hanlon JJ, Wilson JN: Complications of surgical release for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 1978;3:70–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mackinnon SE, McCabe S, Murray JF, Szalai JP, Kelly L, Novak C: Internal neurolysis fails to improve the results of primary carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg 1991;16A:211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  32. May JW Jr, Rosen H: Division of the sensory ramus communicans between the ulnar and median nerves: a complication following carpal tunnel release. J Bone Joint Surg 1981;63-A:836–838.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Meals RA, Shaner M: Variations in digital sensory patterns: a study of the ulnar nerve-median nerve palmar communicating branch. J Hand Surg 1983;8:411–414.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Murphy RX jr, Chernofsky MA, Osborne MA, Wolson AH: Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of persistent carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 1993;18A:113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Murphy RX, Jennings JF, Wukich DK: Major neurovascular complications of endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg 1994;19A:114–118.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Naff N, Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE: The anatomical course of the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve. including a description of its own unique tunnel. J Hand Surg 1993;18B:316–317.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Okutsu I, Ninomiya S, Hamanaka I, Kuroshima N, Inanami H: Measurement of pressure in the carpal canal before and after endoscopic management of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg 1989;71A:679–683.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Okutsu I, Ninomiya S, Takatori Y, Ugawa Y: Endoscopic management of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthroscopy 1989;5:11–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Paget J: Lectures on surgical pathology. London: Longman, 1853, pp 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Palmer DH, Paulson CJ, Lane-Larson CL, Peulen VK, Olson JD: Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a comparison of two techniques with open release. Arthroscopy 1993;9:498–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Phalen GS, Gardner W, Laloude A: Neuropathy of the median nerve due to compression beneath the transverse carpal ligament. J Bone Joint Surg 1950;32:109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Price BA, Miller G: Internal neurolysis. J Foot Surg 1992;31:250–259.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Resnik CT, Miller BW: Endoscopic carpal tunnel release using the subligamentous two-portal technique. Contemp Orthop 1991;22:269–277.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rotman MB, Manske PR: Anatomic relationships of an endoscopic carpal tunnel device to surrounding structure. J Hand Surg 1993;18A:442–450.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schlenker JD, Koulis ChP, Kho LK: Synovialectomy and reconstruction of the retinaculum flexorum in median nerve decompression: technique and early results. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 1993;25:66–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Schwartz JT, Waters PM, Simmon BP: Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a cadaveric study study. Arthroscopy 1993;9:209–213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Scoggin JF, Whipple TL: A potential complication of endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Arthroscopy 1992;8:363–365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Seiler III JG, Barnes K, Gelberman RH, Chalidapong P: Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: an anatomic study of the two-incision method in human cadavers. J Hand Surg 1992;17A:996–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Shinya K, Lanzetta M, Conolly WB: Risk and complications in endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg 1995;20B:222–227.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Siegl JL, Davlin LB, Aulicino PL: An anatomical variation of the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve. J Hand Surg 1993;18B:182–183.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Skoff HD, Sklar R: Endoscopic median nerve decompression: early experiences. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;94:691–694.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Szabo RM: Carpal-tunnel syndrome-general, in Gelberman RH (ed): Operative nerve repair and reconstruction. Vol III. Philadelphia, Lippincott, 1991, pp. 869–888.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Viegas SF, Pollard A, Kaminski K: Carpal arch alteration and related clinical status after endoscopic carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg 1992;17A:1012–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Worseg AP, Pelinka H: Endoscopic carpal tunnel release with the Acufex Uni-Cut System. Orthop Prod News July/Aug/Sept 1994, pp. 38–39.

  55. Worseg AP, Kuzbari R, Korak K, Höcker W, Tschabitscher M, Holle J: Endoscopic release of the carpal ligament using a single-portal carpal tunnel system. Br J Plast Surg (in press 1995).

  56. Zenn MR, Hoffman L, Latrenta G, Hotchkiss R: Variations in digital nerve anatomy. J Hand Surg 1992;17A:1033–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zöch G.: Über die Anpassung der peripheren Nerven an die Bewegung der Extremitäten durch Gleiten und Dehnen: Untersuchungen am Nervus medianus. Acta Chir Austriaca 1992; (suppl 96):3–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Worseg, A.P., Hoflehner, H., Kuzbari, R. et al. Endoskopische karpaltunnelspaltung. Acta Chir Austriaca 27, 277–282 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02625979

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02625979

Schüsselwörter

Key-words

Navigation