Summary
The validity of limiting dilution assays can be compromised or negated by the use of statistical methodology which does not consider all issues surrounding the biological process. This study critically evaluates statistical methods for estimating the mean frequency of responding cells in multiple sample limiting dilution assays. We show that methods that pool limiting dilution assay data, or samples, are unable to estimate the variance appropriately. In addition, we use Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate an unweighted mean of the maximum likelihood estimator, an unweighted mean based on the jackknife estimator, and a log transform of the maximum likelihood estimator. For small culture replicate size, the log transform outperforms both unweighted mean procedures. For moderate culture replicate size, the unweighted mean based on the jackknife produces the most acceptable results. This study also addresses the important issue of experimental design in multiple sample limiting dilution assays. In particular, we demonstrate that optimization of multiple sample limiting dilution assays is achieved by increasing the number of biological samples at the expense of repeat cultures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berkson, J. Minimum chi-square, not maximum likelihood! Ann. Stat. 8:457; 1980.
Box, G. E. P.; Muller, M. A. A note on the generation of random normal deviates. Ann. Math. Stat. 29:610; 1958.
Cobb, L.; Cyr, L.; Schmehl, M. K., et al. Comparison of statistical methods for the analysis of limiting dilution assays. In Vitro 25:76; 1989.
Cyr, L.; Bank, H. L.; Schmehl, M. K., et al. Comparative characteristics of estimators of the mean responding cell density in limiting dilution assays. Submitted.
Cyr, L. Evaluation of statistical methods in limiting dilution assays. Medical Univ. South Carolina; 1990. Thesis.
Does, R. J. J. M.; Strijbosch, L. W. G.; Albers, W. Using jackknife methods for estimating the parameter in dilution series. Biometrics 44:1093; 1988.
Fazekas de St. Groth, S. The evaluation of limiting dilution assays. J. Immunol. Methods 49:R11; 1982.
Finney, D. J. Statistical methods in biological assay, 3rd ed. London: Griffin; 1978.
Fisher, R. A. Statistical methods for research workers, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd; 1928.
Kendall, M. G.; Stuart, A. The advanced theory of statistics, 3rd ed., vol. 2. London: Griffin; 1979.
Kynast, G.; Weber, E. Analysis of a limiting dilution assay by using the single-hit Poisson model—an APL—computer programme. Adv. Med. Biol. 14:53; 1983.
Porter, E. H.; Berry, R. J. The efficient design of transplantable tumor assays. Br. J. Cancer 17:583; 1963.
Rubinstein, R. Y. Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1981.
Strijbosch, L. W. G.; Buurman, W. A. Does, R. J. J. M., et al. Limiting dilution assays-experimental design and statistical analysis. J. Immunol. Methods 97:133; 1987.
Taswell, C. Limiting dilution assays for the determination of immunocompetent cell frequencies. I. Data analysis. J. Immunol. 126:1614; 1981.
Taswell, C. Limiting dilution assays for the determination of immunocompenent cell frequencies. III. Validity tests for the single-hit Poisson model. J. Immunol. Methods 72:29; 1984.
Taswell, C. Limiting dilution assays for the separation, characterization, and quantitation of biologically active particles and their clonal progeny. In: Pretlow T. G.; Pretlow, T. P., eds. Cell separation: methods and selected applications 4. New York: Academic Press; 1987.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cyr, L., Rust, P.F., Bank, H.L. et al. Evaluating the mean frequency of responding cells in limiting dilution assays. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 26, 1035–1042 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02624437
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02624437