Skip to main content
Log in

Second meiotic nondisjunction is not increased in postovulatory aged murine oocytes fertilized in vitro

  • Regular Papers
  • Published:
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We used an in vitro fertilization system to examine the effects of postovulatory oocyte age on nondisjunction at the second meiotic division. After ovulatory-inducing injections of hormone, we recovered mouse oocytes either at the estimated time of ovulation (controls) or 2, 4, 5, 10, or 14 h later. Oocytes were subjected to an in vitro fertilization procedure, and chromosomal preparations were made from first cleavage metaphase eggs. The first cleavage assay reveals morphologically distinguishable paternal and maternal chromosomes. Many of the aged oocytes were activated rather than fertilized by the in vitro procedure, but could still be analyzed for nondisjunction. We foun a tendency toward retention of the second polar body after 10 and 14 h aging. A total of 488 maternal genomes, 290 of which were in the control group, were analyzable for nondisjunction. Seven hyperhaploid genomes (2.4%) were observed in the controls and 6 (3.0%) in the combined aged group. The difference between these two frequencies is not significant (G adj=0.164,P>0.50). In the aged group, one hyperhaploid genome was in the 2-h population, three in the 5-h population, and two in the 10-h population. We were unable to find any significant increase in the frequency of nondisjunction after postovulatory oocyte aging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Austin, C. R. Chromosome deterioration in ageing eggs of the rabbit. Nature 213:1018–1019; 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buckland, R. A.; Evans, H. J.; Sumner, A. T. Identifying mouse chromosomes with the ASG technique. Exp. Cell Res. 69:231–236; 1971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Donahue, R. P.; Karp, L. E. Chromosomal anomalies after fertilization of aged, postovulatory mouse eggs. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 25:24a; 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards, R. G.; Gates, A. H. Timing of the stages of the maturation divisions, ovulation, fertilization and the first cleavage of eggs of adult mice treated with gonadotrophins. J. Endocrinol. 18:292–304; 1959.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fraser, L. R. Rate of fertilizationin vitro and subsequent nuclear development as a function of the post-ovulatory age of the mouse egg. J. Reprod. Fertil. 55:153–160; 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. German, J. Mongolism, delayed fertilization and human sexual behavior. Nature 217:516–518; 1968.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoppe, P. C.; Pitts, S. Fertilizationin vitro and development of mouse ova. Biol. Reprod. 8:420–426; 1973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Juberg, R. C. Origin of chromosomal abnormalities: evidence for delayed fertilization in meiotic nondisjunction. Hum. Genet. 64:122–127; 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Juberg, R. C.; Mowrey, P. N. Origin of nondisjunction in Trisomy 21 syndrome: all studies compiled, parental age analysis, and international comparisons. Am. J. Med. Genet. 16:111–116; 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaufman, M. H. Parthenogenesis in the mouse. Nature 242:475–476; 1973.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaufman, M. H. Early mammalian development: Parthenogenetic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983:9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaufman, M. H. Early mammalian development: Partheogenetic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1983:197–223.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaufman, M. H.; Surani, M. A. H. The effect of osmolarity on mouse parthenogenesis. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 31:513–526; 1974.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marston, J. H.; Chang, M. C. The fertilizable life of ova and their morphology following delayed insemination in mature and immature mice. J. Exp. Zool. 155:237–252; 1964.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin-Deleon, P. A.; Boice, M. L. Spontaneous heteroploidy in one-cell mouse embryos. Cytognet. Cell Genet. 35:57–63; 1983.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Maudlin, I.; Fraser, L. R. The effect of PMSG dose on the incidence of chromosomal anomalies in mouse embryos fertilizedin vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil. 50:275–280; 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McGaughey, R. W.; Chang, M. C. Chromosomes at prometaphase and metaphase of the first cleavage in mouse and hamster eggs. J. Exp. Zool. 177:31–40; 1971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McGrath, J.; Hillman, N. Thein vitro transmission frequency of the t12 mutation in the mouse. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 60:141–151; 1980.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shaver, E. L.; Carr, D. H. Chromosome abnormalities in rabbit blastocysts following fertilization. J. Reprod. Fertil. 14:415–420; 1967.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sokal, R. R.; Rohlf, F. J. Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 2nd ed. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co.; 1981:731–747.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Szollosi, D. Morphological changes in mouse eggs due to aging in the fallopian tube. Am. J. Anat. 130:209–226; 1971.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tarkowski, A. K. An air-drying method of chromosome preparations from mouse eggs. Cytogenetics 5:394–400; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thibault, C. Normal and abnormal fertilization in mammals. Adv. Biosci. 6:63–85; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vickers, A. D. Delayed fertilization and chromosomal anomalies in mouse embryos. J. Reprod. Fertil 20:69–76; 1969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamamoto, M.; Ingalls, T. H. Delayed fertilization and chromosome anomalies in the hamster embryo. Science 176:518–521; 1972.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, grants HD-12035 and HD-19040 to PAM-D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zackowski, J.L., Martin-Deleon, P.A. Second meiotic nondisjunction is not increased in postovulatory aged murine oocytes fertilized in vitro. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 24, 133–137 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02623890

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02623890

Key words

Navigation