Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of employment screening on employee attachment

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an examination of the possible impact of differences in the number of employment screening devices on employee attachment, cognitive dissonance theory was used to deduce the hypothesis that increases in the number of screens would be associated with more favorable job-related attitudes. Contrary to the prediction, results from a national probability sample of 702 full-time employees yielded evidence that an increase in screening was related with increasingly negative responses. Statistical controls for employee demographic differences and organizational size did not alter the conclusion. The need for additional study of the possible marginal utility of multiple screens in the hiring process is highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axel, H. (1990).Corporate Experiences with Drug Testing Programs, Research Report No. 941. New York: Conference Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 177–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. C., Brock, B., Hill, P. C., & Rozelle, R. M. (1981). Letters of recommendation: A question of value.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 296–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1988). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments.Academy of Management Journal, 31, 676–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of National Affairs (1983).Employee Selection Procedures: ASPN-BNA Survey No. 45. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983).Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosier, R. A., & Dalton, D. R. (1983). Equity theory and time: A reformulation.Academy of Management Review, 8, 311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1990). An experimental test of the impact of drug testing programs on potential job applicants’ attitudes and intentions.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 127–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, P. C. (1977). From abstract ideas to concrete instances: Some guidelines for choosing natural research settings.American Psychologist, 32, 604–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1975).A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations. New York: Free Press (Rev. Ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, M. B., & Mathewson, G. C. (1966). The effects of severity of initiation on liking for a group: A replication.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 278–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational practice perspective.Academy of Management Review, 18, 694–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, F. A. (1993).Testing Testing: Social Consequences of the Examined Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D., Coney, K. A., & Best, R. J. (1980).Consumer Behavior. Dallas, TX: Business Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hom, P. Caranikis-Walker, F., Prussia, G., & Griffeth, R. (1992). A meta-analytical structural equations analysis of a model of employee turnover.Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 890–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. (1970). Post-transaction communications and dissonance reduction.Journal of Marketing, 34, 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iles, P. A., & Robertson, I. T. (1989). The impact of personnel selection procedures on candidates. In Herriot, P. (Ed.).Assessment and Selection in Organizations, 257–271, Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 698–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. (1988). Does pre-employment drug use predict on-the-job suitability?.Personnel Psychology, 41, 717–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menasco, M., & Hawkins, D. (1978). A field test of the relationship between cognitive dissonance and state anxiety.Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 650–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osigweh, Yg., C.A.B. (1994). A stakeholder perspective of employee responsibilities and rights.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 7, 279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1965). Properties of organization structure in relation to job attitudes and job behavior.Psychological Bulletin, 64, 23–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads, R. F., & Landy, F. J. (1973). Measurement of attitudes of industrial work groups toward psychology and testing.Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, I. T., & Smith, M. (1989). Personnel selection methods. In Smith, M., & Robertson, I. (Eds.).Advances in selection and assessment, 89–112. Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runkel, P. J., & McGrath, J. E. (1972).Research on Human Behavior: A Systematic Guide to Method. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (1976). Social and situational determinants of interview decisions: Implications for the employment interview.Personnel Psychology, 29, 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. L., & Kotch, D. A. (1989). Individuals’ attitudes toward organizational drug testing policies and practices.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 518–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989).Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio, R. P. (1980). Worker alienation as a moderator of the job quality-job satisfaction relationship: The case of racial differences.Academy of Management Journal, 23, 479–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H., & Deci, E. L. (1971). The stability of postdecision dissonance: A follow-up study of the job attitudes of business school graduates.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J. P. (1992).Organizational Entry: Recruitment, Selection, Orientation and Socialization of Newcomers. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J. P., & Collella, A. (1989). Organization entry research: Current status and future directions. In Rowland, K. R., & Ferris, G. R. (Eds.)Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 7, 59–120. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E. J., & Weick, K. E. (1979). Unobtrusive measures in organizational theory: A reminder.Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 650–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werbel, J. D., & Landau, J. (1994). The effectiveness of different recruitment sources: A mediating variable analysis.Proceedings of the National Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, Vol. 1, 525–528.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vecchio, R.P. The influence of employment screening on employee attachment. Employ Respons Rights J 9, 119–129 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02622254

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02622254

Key words

Navigation