Skip to main content
Log in

Organizational perspectives on community mental health centers

  • Published:
Administration in mental health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The classical, human relations and contingency types of organization are outlined by the authors. They contend that CMHCs with a classical organizational structure are not likely to function effectively. The contingency type of organization is suggested as the model CMHCs should adopt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Coch, L., and French, J. Overcoming resistance to change. In: Cartwright, D., and Zander, A., eds.Group Dynamics: Research and Theory. New York: Harper, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goshen, C. The changing role of the mental health organization.Community Mental Health Journal, 2(2): 121–123, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiresuk, T., and Sherman, R. Goal attainment scaling, a manual method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs.Community Mental Health Journal, 4 (6): 553–453, 1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. C. Community and mental health—An attempt at a conceptual framework.Community Mental Health Journal, 1: 301–308, 1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, B. Links and barriers between hospital and community.Community Mental Health Journal, 1 (1): 69–72, 1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. R., and Lorsch, M. W.Organization and Environment. Homewood, Illinois: Irwin, Inc., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. Frontiers in group dynamics.Human Relations. I(1): 5–42, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K.Resolving Social Conflicts. New York: Harper, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litwak, E. Models of bureaucracy that permit conflict.American Journal of Sociology, 57: 173–183, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massie, J. L. Management theory. In: March, J. G., ed.Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations.American Sociological Review, 32: 194–208, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roethlisberger, F. J., and Dickson, W. J.Management and the Worker. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W.Scientific Management. New York: Harper, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. J., and Cumming, J. Theoretical malaise and community mental health. In Cowen, E.; Gardner, E.; Zax, M., eds.Emergent Approaches to Mental Health Problems. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M.The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. Bureaucracy. In Gerth, H., and Mills, C. W., eds.From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perlman, B., Tornatzky, L.G. Organizational perspectives on community mental health centers. Administration in Mental Health 3, 27–31 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02619703

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02619703

Keywords

Navigation