Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of adhesive bond strength of different cell types in vitro

  • Published:
In Vitro Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

An established in vitro assay for quantitating cell-substratum adhesion has been utilized to measure the adhesiveness of 10 cell lines to a colloidal overlay. The procedure, a derivation of the William’s blister test for adhesives, involves growing cells to confluency on a polystyrene surface and then overlaying the monolayers with a Bacto-agar substratum. The cell-agar substratum systems are debonded and thera,adhesive bond strength, of the separation of the two interfaces calculated.

Thera’s were determined for the following cell types: SGL (gingival epithelial-like), L (transformed mouse fibroblasts), HeLa (human carcinoma), MDCK (canine kidney epithelial), WI-38 (human embryonic lung), Flow 1000 (human embryonic skin—muscle), Flow 4000 (human embryonic kidney), Flow 5000 (whole human embryo), BALB/c 3T3 (mouse fibroblasts) and SV40-transformed BALB/c 3T3 (simian virus 40-transformed mouse fibroblasts).

Transformed cells (L, HeLa and SV40-transformed BALB/c 3T3) proved to be quantitatively less adhesive (ra/cell) than either fibroblast or epithelial-like cell lines. Of the “normal” cells tested the kidney cells, human embryonic fibroblast and canine epithelial cells, and the gingival epithelial-like cells demonstrated a weaker binding to the colloidal overlay than the mouse fibroblasts (BALB/c 3T3), the human embryonic lung, the human embryonic skin-muscle, and the whole human embryo fibroblast cell lines.

Concanavalin A increased the bonding strength of Flow 5000 cells after 24 hr incubation; however, the adhesiveness of the treated BALB/c 3T3 cells remained similar to the unterested samples while thera of the treated SV40-transformed BALB/c 3T3 cells decreased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grinnell, F. Biochemical analysis of cell adhesion to a substratum and its possible relevance to cell metastasis. Membrane and Neoplasia: New approches and strategies. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc.: 1976: 227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buultjens, F. E. J.; Edwards, J. G. Adhesive selectivity is exhibitedin vitro by cells from adjacent tissues of the embryonic chick retina. J. Cell Sci. 23: 101–116; 1977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yamada, K. M.; Olden, K. Review. Fibronectins—adhesive glycoprotein of cell surface and blood. Nature 275: 179–184; 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang, R. T. C. Cell adhesion mesiated by glycolipids. Nature 276: 624–626; 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Seglen, P. O.; Fossa, J. Attachment of rat hepatocytesin vitro to substrata of serum protein, collagen, or concanavalin A. Exp. Cell Res. 116: 199–206; 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Attramadel, A.; Jonsen, J. The adhesion of mouse lymphoblastoma cells to glass beads. J. Periodont. Res. 5: 122–126; 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berwick, L.; Coman, D. R. Some chemical factors in cellular adhesion and stickiness. Cancer Res. 22: 982–986; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weiss, L. Studies on cellular adhesion in tissue culture. XIV. Positively charged surface groups and the rate of cell adhesion. Exp. Cell Res. 83: 311–318; 1974.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fletcher, R. D.; Breitling, M.; Adamiak, J. K.; Williams, M. L., Jr. Measurements of the adhesive strength of a gingival cell line to agar. In Vitro 13: 857–860; 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fletcher, R. D.; Admiak, J. K.; Labant, M. C.; Albertson, J. N., Jr. Improvements of in vitro cell-material adhesion measurements. J. Periodont. Res. 14: 482–486; 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fletcher, R. D.; Shoemaker, R.; Albertson, J. N., Jr. Desmonsomes observed in a gingival cell line. J. Dental Res. 56: 1106; 1977.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fletcher, R. D.; Schneider, G.; Labant, M. C.; Albertson, J. N., Jr. Anin vitro technique for measuring cell adhesion to rigid materials. J. Dental Res. 58: 1750–1751; 1979.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernandez, S. M.; Berlin, R. D. Cell surface distribution of lectin receptors determined by resonance energy transfer. Nature 264: 411–415; 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Grinnell, F.; Milam, M.; Srere, P. A. Studies on cell adhesion II. Adhesion of cells to surfaces of diverse chemical composition and inhibition of adhesion by sulfhydryl binding reagents. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 153: 193–198; 1972.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Prinz, R.; Von Figura, K. Adhesion of human skin fibroblasts. Effect of tetravalent, divalent and monovalent concanavalin A. Exp. Cell Res. 112: 275–279; 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vaheri, A.; Mosher, D. F. High molecular weight, cell surface-associated glycoprotein (fibronectin) lost in malignant transformation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 516: 1–25; 1978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Leighton, J.; Broda, Z.; Estes, L.; Justh, G. Secretory activity and oncogenicity of a cell line (MDCK) derived from canine kidney. Science 163: 472–473; 1969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boone, C. W.; Takeichi, N.; Paranjpe, M.; Gilden, R.: Vasoformative sarcomas arising from BALA/3T3 cells attached to solid substrates. Cancer Res. 36: 1626–1633; 1976.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Voyles, B. A.; McGrath, C. M. Markers to distinguish normal and neoplastic mammary epithelial cellsin vitro: Comparison of saturation density, morphology and concanavalin A reactivity. Int. J. Cancer 18: 498–509; 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by National Institute of Dental Research Grant DE03983.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Labant, M.G., Fletcher, R.D. Comparison of adhesive bond strength of different cell types in vitro. In Vitro 16, 767–774 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02619311

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02619311

Key words

Navigation