Skip to main content
Log in

Differentiation and cancer

  • Published:
In Vitro Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Cancer is discussed from a standpoint of a postembryonic differentiation. A differentiation requires the interaction of an exogenous inductive stimulus with competent precursor cell, which then evolve a new tissue with unique, stable heritable properties distinguishable from the progenitor. Evidence is cited pinpointing the normal stem cells of tissues as the competent target precursor cells in carcinogenesis. The resultant phenotype differs from its progenitor and has stable and unique characteristics. All of the characteristics associated with malignancy are expressed during some stage of development, suggesting that the normal genome contains the information necessary for malignant expression, and that the mechanism of malignancy is probably an alteration of control of genomic expression.

Malignant tissue, like normal tissue, maintains itself by proliferation and differentiation of its stem cells; at least, that is what was observed in two tumors examined. In each of these tumors the differentiated progeny of the malignant stem cells proved to be benign.

A third tumor was adapted to growth in vitro and under the conditions of the experiments could be modulated by altering the in vitro conditions. These data suggest that direction of the naturally occurring differentiation that occurs in tumors may be a suitable therapeutic alternative to cytotoxic chemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grobstein, C. 1959. Differentiation of vertebrate cells. In: J. Brachet and A. E. Mirsky (Eds.),The Cell. Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, pp. 437–496.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leblond, C. P. and C. E. Stevens, 1948. The constant renewal of the intestinal epithelium in the albino rat. Anat. Rec. 100: 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stevens, L. C., and C. C. Little, 1954. Spontaneous testicular teratomas in inbred strain of mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 40: 1080–1087.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pierce, G. B., and F. J. Dixon 1959. Testicular teratomas. I. The demonstration of teratogenesis by metamorphosis of multipotential cells. Cancer 12: 573–583.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pierce, G. B., F. J. Dixon, and E. L. Verney. 1960. Teratocarcinogenic and tissue forming potentials of the cell types comprising neoplastic embryoid bodies. Lab. Invest. 9: 583–602.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kleinsmith, L. J., and G. B. Pierce. 1964. Multipotentiality of single embryonal carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 24: 1544–1551.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pierce, G. B. 1967. Teratocarcinoma: model for a developmental concept of cancer. In: A. A. Moscona and A. Monroy (Eds.),Current Topics in Developmental Biology. Vol. 2. Academic Press, New York, pp. 223–246.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stevens, L. C. 1967. Origin of testicular teratomas from primordial germ cells in mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 38: 549–552.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pierce, G. B., L. C. Stevens, and P. K. Nakane. 1967. Ultrastructural analysis of the early development of teratocarcinomas. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 39: 755–773.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pierce, G. B., and C. Wallace. 1971. Differentiation of malignant to benign cells. Cancer Res. 31: 127–134.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pierce, G. B. 1966. Ultrastructure of human testicular tumors. Cancer 19: 1963–1983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Makino, S., 1956. Further evidence favoring the concept of the stem cell in ascites tumors of rats. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 63: 818–830.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pierce, G. B., A. R. Midgley, J. Sri Ram, and J. D. Feldman. 1962. Parictal yolk sac carcinoma. Clue to the histogenesis of Reichert's membrane of the mouse embryo. Am. J. Pathol. 41: 549–566.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pierce, G. B. 1970. Epithelial basement membrane: origin, development and role in disease. In: E. A. Balazs (Ed.)Chemistry and Molecular Biology of the Intercellular Matrix. Academic Press, New York, pp. 471–506.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lustig, L., P. K. Nakane, and G. B. Pierce. 1970. Biosynthesis of epithelial basement membrane. Fed. Proc. 29A: 554.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Orfanakis, N. G., P. K. Nakane, and G. B. Pierce. 1971. Biosynthesis and secretion of epithelial basement membrane. Presented at Annual Meeting of American Association of Pathologists and Bacteriologists, Montreal

  17. Pierce, G. B., and P. K. Nakane, 1969. Basement membranes: synthesis and deposition in response to cellular injury. Lab. Invest. 21: 27–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mukerjee, H., J. Sri Ram, and G. B. Pierce. 1965. Basement membranes. V. Chemical composition of neoplastic basement membrane mucoprotein. Am. J. Pathol. 46: 49–57.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by Grant E105 from the American Cancer Society and Grant AM 13112 from the United States Public Health Service.

Supported by a Traineeship from National Institutes of Health Training Grant GM 00977.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barry Pierce, G., Johnson, L.D. Differentiation and cancer. In Vitro 7, 140–145 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02617957

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02617957

Keywords

Navigation