Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analgesic efficacy of meperidine hydrochloride used alone and in combination with promethazine hydrochloride

A double-blind, cross-over study

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Summary and Conclusions

Initially, 51 consecutive patients who had undergone hemorrhoidectomy were included in a double-blind, cross-over study to determine whether or not 50 mg. of meperidine would provide postoperative analgesia equivalent to 100 mg. of meperidine when the 50 mg. of meperidine was supplemented with 50 mg. of promethazine. Postoperatively, 40 of the 51 patients completed the cross-over study, nine required only one analgesic dose, and two did not require any medication for the relief of pain.

The results were tabulated and the data were interpreted on a statistical basis, according to analytic methods of Beecher and Herdan. There was no significant difference between the relief of pain afforded by one preparation as compared to the relief produced by the other. This was true for members of the cross-over group and members of the total group.

The side effects observed were insignificant, except for the marked decrease in blood pressure noted in several patients after the administration of meperidine. It would appear that the use of promethazine with meperidine diminishes the characteristic effect of meperidine. The addition of promethazine to the meperidine did not increase the number of patients who slept after the administration of the medication.

It can be concluded, therefore, that the addition of promethazine to a given amount of narcotic analgesic agent affords relief of pain comparable to that obtained by double the amount of narcotic analgesic agent alone. This conclusion substantiates what has been suggested in medical literature; namely, that promethazine potentiates the analgesic action of a narcotic agent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adelman, M. H., Elliott Jacobson, P. A. Lief and S. A. Miller: Promethazine hydrochloride in surgery and obstetrics. J.A.M.A.169: 73, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beecher, H. K.: Measurement of Subjective Responses: Quantitative Effects of Drugs. New York, Oxford University Press, 1959, p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carroll, J. J. and R. S. Moir: Use of promethazine (phenergan) hydrochloride in obstetrics: Report of a two and one-half year survey. J.A.M.A.168: 2218, 1958.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cullen, S. C.: Current comment and case reports: A new use for promethazine hydrochloride. Anesthesiology.19: 402, 1958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Drill, V. A. [Ed.]: Pharmacology in Medicine: A Collaborative Textbook. New York, Blakiston Division, 1958, p. 231.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Egbert, L. D., M. L. Norton, J. E. Eckenhoff and R. D. Dripps: A comparison in man of the effects of promethazine, secobarbital, and meperidine alone and in combination in certain respiratory functions and for use in preanesthetic medication. South. M. J.51: 1173, 1958.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gruber, C. M., E. R. Hart and C. M. Gruber, Jr.: The pharmacology and toxicology of ethyl ester of 1-methyl-4-phenylpiperidine-4-carboxylic acid (demerol). J. Pharmacol. & Exper. Therap.73: 319, 1941.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Halpern, B. N. and R. Ducrot: Recherches expérimentales sur une série chimique de corps doués de propriétés antihistaminiques puissantes: Les derivés de la thiodiphénylamine (T.D.A.). Compt. rend. Soc. biol.140: 361, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Halpern, B. N. and Jean Hamburger: A new synthetic anti-histamine substance derived from phenothiazine (phenergan, 3, 277 R.P.). Canad. M.A.J.59: 322, 1948.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Herdan, G.: Statistics of Therapeutic Trials. New York, Elsevier Publishing Company, 1955, Chapter 6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Potts, C. R. and J. C. Ullery: Maternal and fetal effects of obstetrical analgesia: A scientific exhibit. (Unpublished data.)

  12. Sadove, M. S. and T. S. Frye: Preoperative sedation and production of a quiescent state in children. J.A.M.A.164: 1729, 1957.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sheiner, Ben and B. D. Pinck: Promethazine drip in the postoperative management of suprapubic prostatectomy. J.A.M.A.171: 1955, 1959.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, R. M. and Mervyn Jeffries: The evaluation of sedative agents for preoperative use in children. Anesth. & Analg.38: 166, 1959.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Winne, B.E., Pineda, J.R. & Bacon, H.E. Analgesic efficacy of meperidine hydrochloride used alone and in combination with promethazine hydrochloride. Dis Colon Rectum 4, 121–124 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02616698

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02616698

Keywords

Navigation