Conclusion
Invitations to inquiry have been shown to be not only an interesting and effective way of teaching science as inquiry by inquiry, but also as a highly effective means for teacher education. It is recommended that institutions which employ the classic model of microteaching (Allen and Ryan, 1969) revise their approach and adopt a more holistic approach such as the one described here.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, D. W., & Ryan, K. A. (1969).Microteaching. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bloom, B. S., (Ed.). (1956).Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as inquiry, In J. J. Schwab & P. Brandwein (Eds.).The teaching of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schwab, J. J. (1963).Biology teachers’ handbook. New York: Wiley.
Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education.Research on Teaching and Teacher Education,4, 99–110.
Welch, W. W., Klopfer, L. E., Aikenhead, G. S., & Robinson, J. T. (1981). The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations.Science Education,65, 33–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is dedicated to the memory of Dr. Joseph J. Schwab, a master of science teacher education and a curriculum scholar whose ideas continue to illuminate classroom practice.
About this article
Cite this article
Tamir, P. Considering the role of invitations to inquiry in scienceteaching and in teacher education. J Sci Teacher Educ 1, 41–45 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614713
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614713