This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
American Association of University Women. (1992).How schools shortchange girls. Washington, DC: Author.
American Association of University Women. (1993).Hostile hallways: The AAUW survey on sexual harassment in America’s schools. Washington, DC: Author.
Barone, T. (1988). Curriculum platforms and literature. In L. Beyer & M. Apple (Eds.),The curriculum: Problems, politics, and possibilities (pp. 140–165). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Blank, R., & Dalklic, M. (1990).State indicators of science and mathematics education, 1990. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
Britzman, D. (1991).Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Brumfield, R., & Leonard, R. (1983). The student teaching experience: A time to consolidate one’s perceptions.College Student Journal, 17(4), 401–406.
Eccles, J. (1989). Bringing young women to math and science. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.),Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives (pp. 36–58). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (1983).Learning to teach. East Lansing: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
Gallagher, J., & Tobin, K. (1987). Teacher management and student engagement in high school science.Science Education, 71(4), 535–556.
Gibbons, A. (1992). Key issue: Mentoring.Science, 255, 1368–1369.
Hewitt, N., & Seymour, E. (1991).Factors contributing to high attrition rates among science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors. Boulder: University of Colorado.
Kahle, J. B. (Ed.). (1985).Women in science: A report from the field. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
Kahle, J. B. (1989).Images of scientists: Gender issues in science classrooms (Monograph No 4). Perth: Curtin University of Technology, The Key Center for School Science and Mathematics.
Kahle, J. B. (1990). Real students take chemistry and physics: Gender issues. In K. Tobin, J. B. Kahle, & B. Fraser (Eds.),Windows into science classrooms: Problems associated with higher-level cognitive learning (pp. 92–134). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
Kennedy, M. M. (1990).Policy issues in teacher education. East Lansing: Michigan State University, National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
Lortie, D. (1975).School teacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Martin, J. R. (1976). What should we do with a hidden curriculum when we find one?Curriculum Inquiry, 6(2), 135–151.
Martin, J. R. (1991). The contradiction and the challenge of the educated woman.Women’s Studies Quarterly, 1, 6–27.
Matyas, M., & Malcolm, S. (1991).Investing in human potential: Science and engineering at the crossroads. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Meece, J. (1987). The influence of school experiences on the development of gender schemata. In L. S. Liden & M. L. Signorella (Eds.),Children’s gender schemata: New directions for child development (pp. 57–73). New York: Jossey-Bass.
Morgan, K. (1985). Should public education be gender free?Educational Theory, 35(4), 370–375.
Mullins, I., & Jenkins, L. (1988).The science report card: Elements of risk and recovery. (Report No: 17-S-01). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Rich, A. (1979).On lies, secrets, and silence: Selected prose, 1966–1978. New York: W. W. Norton.
Rosser, S. (1990).Female-friendly science. New York: Pergamon Press.
Scantlebury, K. (1994). Emphasizing gender issues in the undergraduate preparation of science teachers: Practicing what we preach.Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 1(2), 153–164.
Skelton, C. (1987). A study of gender discrimination in a primary programme of teacher training.Journal of Education for Teaching, 13(2), 162–176.
Skelton, C., & Hanson, J. (1989). Schooling the teachers: Gender and initial teacher education. In S. Acker (Ed.),Teachers, gender and careers (pp. 109–122). New York: Falmer Press.
Tobin, K. (1987). Gender differences in science: They don’t happen here! In B. Fraser & G. Giddings (Eds.), Gender issues in science education (pp. 37–45). Perth: Curtin University of Technology.
Tobin, K. (1990). Teacher mind frames and science learning. In K. Tobin, J. B. Kahle, & B. Fraser (Eds.),Windows into science classrooms: Problems associated with higher-level cognitive learning (pp. 33–91). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
Tobin, K., & Gallagher, J. (1987). The role of target students in the science classroom.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(1), 61–75.
Tobin, K., & Garnett, P. (1987). Gender differences in science activities.Science Education, 71(1), 91–104.
Vetter, B. (Ed.) (1992).ManPower Comments, 29(3), 21.
Whyte, J. (1984). Observing sex stereotypes and interactions in the school laboratory and workshop.Educational Review, 36(1), 75–86.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This material is based upon work supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation (Grant No. HRD 945-0022). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
About this article
Cite this article
Scantlebury, K. Challenging gender-blindness in preservice secondary science teachers. J Sci Teacher Educ 6, 134–142 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614571
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614571