Skip to main content
Log in

Preparing student teachers for alternative assessment in science

  • Published:
Journal of Science Teacher Education

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bok, D. (1986). Toward higher learning.Change, 18(6), 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Education. (1990).Education summit. Sacramento, CA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Education. (1993a).Golden State Examination in biology: A guide for teachers and students. Sacramento, CA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Education. (1993b).Golden State Examination in chemistry: A guide for teachers and students. Sacramento, CA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champagne, A., Newell, B., & Sigrin, T. (1992). Directions for research and development: Alternative methods of assessing scientific literacy.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 841–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, W. (1991). State-wide student assessment.Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(2), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Chief State School Officers. (1992).State policies on science and mathematics education 1992. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, T. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students.Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Education Commission of the States. (1978).National assessment of educational progress: A project of the Education Commission of the States. Washington DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Education Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Commission of the States. (1991).National assessment of educational progress: A project of the Education Commission of the States. Washington DC: United States Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, W., & Madaus, G. (1989). Searching for alternatives to standardized tests: Whys, whats, and whithers.Phi Delta Kappan, 70(5), 683–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R. (1993). Educational assessment: Expanded expectations and challenges.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983).A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council on Education Standards and Testing. (1992).Raising standards for American education. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, D., & Medina, J. (1989). Standardized testing: Harmful to educational health.Phi Delta Kappan, 70(5), 688–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, F. (1991). Linking restructuring to authentic student achievement.Phi Delta Kappan, 72(6), 458–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1990).The case for authentic assessment. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, H. G. (1987). Introduction to evaluation and testing.Educational Policy, 1, 175–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D. (1993). Launching a revolution in standards and assessments.Phi Delta Kappan, 4(10), 767–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzer, S. (1993). Designing an authentic assessment.Educational Leadership, 50(7), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiggins, R., Conklin N., & Bridgeford, N. (1986). Classroom assessment: A key to effective education.Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 5(2), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Education. (1991).America 2000: An education strategy. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Labor. (1992).What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment.Phi Delta Kappan, 70(9), 703–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. (1991). Standards, not standardization: Evoking quality student work.Educational Leadership, 48(5), 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessment: Authenticity, context, and validity.Phi Delta Kappan, 74(3), 200–214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This material is based upon work supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation California State University Student Teaching Development Project (DOE-9250027) and the W. M. Keck Foundation. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding ordanizations.

About this article

Cite this article

Herr, N., Holzer, M., Martin, M. et al. Preparing student teachers for alternative assessment in science. J Sci Teacher Educ 6, 27–32 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614544

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614544

Keywords

Navigation