Skip to main content
Log in

On selecting the best ofk lognormal distributions

  • Publications
  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Fork lognormal populations, which differ only in one certain parameter Ϙ, the problem of finding the population with the largest value ofϑ is considered. For two-parameter lognormal families, several natural choices ofϑ are treated, where the problem can be solved, through logarithmic transformation of the observations, within the framework of estimating parameters ink, possibly restricted, normal populations. For three-parameter lognormal families, this standard approach of selecting in terms of natural estimators fails to work ifϑ is the “guaranteed lifetime”. For this case, a selection procedure is derived which is based on anL-statistic which has the smallest asymptotic variance. Of importance here is that it is location equivariant, whereas it does not matter what it actually estimates. Comparisons are made with other suitable selection rules, through the asymptotic relative efficiencies, as well as in an example of intermediate sample sizes. It is shown that only in the latter, the selection rule, which is based on the sample minima, compares favorably.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitchison J, Brown JAC (1969) The lognormal distribution. 4th ed. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AC, Whitten BJ (1980) Estimation in the three-parameter lognormal distribution. J Amer Statist Assoc 75:399–404

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons DI, McDonald GC (1975) Small-sample estimation for the lognormal distribution with unit shape parameter. IEEE Transactions on Reliability R-24:290–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SS (1962) Life test sampling plans for normal and lognormal distributions. Technometrics 4:151–175

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SS, McDonald GC, Galarneau DI (1974) Moments, product moments and percentage points of the order statistics from the lognormal distribution for samples of size twenty and less. Sankhyā Ser B 36:230–260

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SS, Panchapakesan S (1979) Multiple decision procedures. J. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Huber PJ (1981) Robust statistics. J. Wiley, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hustý J (1981) Ranking and selection procedures for location parameter case based onL-estimates. Aplikace Matematiky 26:377–388

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hustý J (1984) Subset selection of the largest location parameter based onL-estimates. Aplikace Matematiky 29:397–410

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson NL, Kotz S (1970) Continuous univariate distributions-1. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane VE (1982) Standard and goodness-of-fit parameter estimation methods for the three-parameter lognormal distribution. Commun Statist-Theor Meth 11:1935–1957

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • LaRiccia VN, Kindermann RP (1983) An asymptotically closed form estimator for the three-parameter lognormal distribution. Commun Statist-Theor Meth 12:243–261

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbetter MR, Lindgren G, Rootzén H (1983) Extremes and related properties of random sequences and processes. Springer-Verlag, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann EL (1983) Theory of point estimation. J Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Martz HF, Waller RA (1982) Bayesian reliability analysis. J. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Müller PH, Neumann P, Storm R (1977) Tables for mathematical statistics (German). Carl-Hanser-Verlag, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Miescke KJ (1979) Identification and selection procedures based on tests. Ann Statist 7:207–219

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sampford MR (1953) Some inequalities on Mill’s ratio and related functions. Ann Math Statist 24:130–132

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shorack GR (1972) Functions of order statistics. Ann Math Statist 43:412–427

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner A (1971) Bayesian and non-Bayesian analysis of the log-normal distribution and log-normal regression. J Amer Statist Assoc 66:327–330

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research of this author was supported by the Office of Naval Research Contract N00014-88-K-0170 and NSF Grant Number DMS-8606964 at Purdue University. Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government.

The research of this author was supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research Grant 85-0347 at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, S.S., Miescke, K.J. On selecting the best ofk lognormal distributions. Metrika 36, 233–247 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614096

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614096

Key words

Navigation