Skip to main content
Log in

On two properties of an unequal probability sampling scheme

  • Publications
  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

For an inclusion probability proportional to size (IPPS) sampling scheme recently proposed by Saxena, Singh and Srivastava (1986), it is shown that under certain simple verifiable conditions (1) the Horvitz-Thompson (1952) estimator based on it has a smaller variance than the variance of the Hansen-Hurwitz (1943) estimator based on probability proportional to size (PPS) sampling with replacement (WR) both involving the same size-measures and the expected sample size in the former being equal to the number of draws in the latter and (2) the Yates-Grundy (1953) estimator for the variance of the Horvitz-Thompson estimator based on this IPPS scheme is uniformly non-negative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Hansen MH, Hurwitz WN (1943) On the theory of sampling from finite populations. Ann Math Statist 14:333–362

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz DG, Thompson DJ (1952) A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J Amer Statist Assoc 47:663–685

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena RR, Singh P, Srivastava AK (1986) An unequal probability sampling scheme. Biometrika 73:761–763

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yates F, Grundy PM (1953) Selection without replacement from within strata with probability proportional to size. J Roy Statist Soc B 15:253–261

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adhikary, A.K., Chaudhuri, A. On two properties of an unequal probability sampling scheme. Metrika 36, 161–166 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614089

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614089

Key words

Navigation