Skip to main content
Log in

Admissible unbiased variance estimation in finite population sampling under randomized response

  • I. Publications
  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

LetP be the proportion of units in a finite population possessing a sensitive attribute. We prove the admissibility of (i) an unbiased estimator of the variance of a general homogeneous linear unbiased estimator ofP and (ii) an unbiased estimator of the population varianceP(1−P), based on an arbitrary but fixed sampling design, under the randomized response plans due to Warner (1965) and Eriksson (1973). Admissibility of an unbiased strategy for estimating the population variance is also established.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adhikary AK, Chaudhuri A, Vijayan K (1984) Optimum sampling strategies for randomized response trials. Internat Statist Rev 52:115–125

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson SA (1973) A new model for randomized response. Internat Statist Rev 41:101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu TP (1974) A general unbiased estimator for the variance of a finite population. Sankhya Sr C 36:23–32

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta S, Kundu D (1989) Estimation of finite population mean in randomized response surveys. J Statist Plan Inf 23:117–125

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Warner SL (1965) Randomized response — A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J Amer Statist Assoc 60:63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sengupta, S., Kundu, D. Admissible unbiased variance estimation in finite population sampling under randomized response. Metrika 38, 71–82 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02613600

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02613600

Keywords

Navigation