Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

In order to improve the output of automatic assembly machines, one must not only improve their inherent reliability, but also minimise the downtime due to the lack of machined parts. The downtime essentially depends on both the mean output of the machines and transfer lines supplying the assembly machine with parts and the fluctuations in their production rate over a given time interval (hour or shift), as measured by their capability to run at a given speed. Methods are presented for analysing the effect of variations in piece part production on assembly output, and for determining what size of part stocks (buffers) are required to offset the fluctuations in piece part production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

b :

index determining the curve form of the tool distribution time

B i :

relative duration of downtime of theith section of the line or theith section of the flow

G :

gamma function

Q :

productivity of machine tool or line (pieces min−1)

T c :

cycle duration (min)

γ:

\(v = \frac{{D_\eta }}{{1 - \eta }}\)

ε:

fraction of line failures due to equipment failure

η:

utilisation factor

λ:

failure rate,\(1/\bar \tau \)

μu :

reconditioning rate,\(1/\bar \tau _r \)

μu :

tool-reconditioning rate,\(1/\bar \tau _u \)

\(\bar \tau \) :

mean time before failure (MTBF) for a machine or a line (min)

\(\bar \tau _r \) :

mean time for reconditioning (min)

\(\bar \tau _u \) :

mean time for tool replacement (min)

D :

dispersion

F :

function

P :

probability

References

  1. A. J. Dashchenko and A. Y. Zolotutin. “Optimising lay-out diagrams for various nonsynchronous assembly lines and the basis of productivity and reliability”,International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,1(1), pp. 85–94, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. J. Dashchenko and A. P Belonosov,Design of Automatic Lines, Vyshaya shkola Publ., Moscow, p. 327, 1983 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reliability Handbook, vols. 1–3, Mir Publ., Moscow, 1970.

  4. A. J. Dashchenko, “Methods of optimisation” inAutomatic Lines in Machine Building, vol. 1. Mashinostroenie Publ., Moscow, pp. 162–239, 1984 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. J. Dashchenko, “Structure optimisation and statistical modelling of technological machine systems”,International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2(3), pp. 73–102, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. J. Dashchenko and V. N. Redin, “Control of cutting tool replacement by durability distribution”.International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,3(5), pp. 39–60, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vasil'ev, V.N., Dashchenko, A.I. & Redin, V.N. Assembly-line output: Problems and approaches. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 4, 384–397 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02604337

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02604337

Keywords

Navigation