Skip to main content

The exclusion of non-english-speaking persons from research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine how often non-English-speaking (NES) persons are excluded from medical research.

DESIGN: Self-administered survey.

PARTICIPANTS: A Medline search identified all original investigations on provider-patient relations published in major U.S. journals from 1989 through 1991, whose methodologies involved direct interaction between researcher and subject (N=216). Each study’s corresponding author was surveyed; 81% responded.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 172 respondents, 22% included NES persons; among theseincluders, 16% had not considered the issue during the study design process, and 32% thought including the NES had affected their study results. Among the 40% who excluded the NES (excluders), the most common reason was not having thought of the issue (51%), followed by translation issues and recruitment of bilingual staff. The remaining 35% (others) indicated that there were no NES persons in their study areas.

CONCLUSIONS: NES persons are commonly excluded from provider-patient communication studies appearing in influential journals, potentially limiting the generalizability of study findings. Because they are often excluded through oversight, heightened awareness among researchers and granting institutions, along with the development of valid instruments in varied languages, may increase representation of non-English-speaking subjects in research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1990 Census of Population and Housing: Summary Social, Economic and Housing Characteristics. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Center for Health Statistics. Plan and operation of the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1982–84. Vital Health Stat. 1985; Series 1, number 19. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 85-1321. Public Health Service. Washington: US Government Printing Office.

  3. National Institutes of Health. NIH Guide 1990;35(19):1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Giachello AL, Bell R, Aday LA, Andersen RM. Uses of the 1980 census for Hispanic health services research. Am J Public Health. 1983;73:266–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Howard CA, Samet JM, Buechley RW, Schrag SD, Key CR. Survey research in New Mexico Hispanics: some methodological issues. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;117:27–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aday L, Chiu GY, Andersen R. Methodological issues in health care surveys of the Spanish heritage population. Am J Public Health. 1980;70:367–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deyo RA. Pitfalls in measuring the health status of Mexican Americans: comparative validity of the English and Spanish Sickness Impact Profile. Am J Public Health. 1984;74:569–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berkanovic E. The effect of inadequate language translation on Hispanic’s responses to health surveys. Am J Public Health. 1980;70:1273–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Alonso J, Anto JM, Moreno C. Spanish version of the Nottingham Health Profile: translation and preliminary validity. Am J Public Health. 1990;80:704–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dresser R. Wanted: single white male for medical research. Hastings Cent Rep. 1992;January–February:24–29.

  11. Wenger NK. Exclusion of the elderly and women from coronary trials: is their quality of care compromised? JAMA. 1992;268:1460–1.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pinn VW. Women’s health research: prescribing change and addressing the issues. JAMA. 1992;268:1921–2.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gurwitz JH, Col NF, Avorn J. The exclusion of the elderly and women from clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992;268:1417–22.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Svensson CK. Representation of American blacks in clinical trials of new drugs. JAMA. 1989;261:263–5.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cotton P. Is there still too much extrapolation from data on middle-aged white men? JAMA. 1990;263:1049–50.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. El-Sadr W, Capps L. The challenge of minority recruitment in clinical trials for AIDS. JAMA. 1992;267:954–7.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Marcos LR. The effect of interview language on the evaluation of psychopathology in Spanish-American schizophrenic patients. Am J Psychiatry. 1973;130:549–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hingson R, Strunin L, Craven DE, et al. Survey of AIDS knowledge and behavior changes among Massachusetts adults. Prev Med. 1989;18:806–16.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Vega W, Warheit G, Buhl-Auth J, Meinhardt K. The prevalence of depressive symptoms among Mexican Americans and Ang-los. Am J Epidemiol. 1984;120(4):592–607.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kirkman-Liff B, Mondragon D. Language of interview: relevance for research of Southwest Hispanics. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1399–1404.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu DJ, Covell RM. Health care usage by Hispanic outpatients as a function of primary language. West J Med. 1986;144:490–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu DJ, Keller R, Fleming D. Communicating AIDS information to Hispanics: the importance of language and media preference. Am J Prev Med. 1989;5:196–200.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. National Library of Medicine. Medical Subject Headings-Annotated Alphabetic List 1991. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Anonymous. Purpose and procedure (abbreviated). ACP J Club. 1993;September/ October:A-15.

  25. Hall JA, Roter DL, Katz NR. Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med Care. 1988;26:657–75.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Sections of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frayne, S.M., Burns, R.B., Hardt, E.J. et al. The exclusion of non-english-speaking persons from research. J Gen Intern Med 11, 39–43 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02603484

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02603484

Key words

  • Subjects
  • non-English-speaking
  • ethnic groups
  • language
  • research protocols
  • clinical
  • health priorities