Summary
In this paper the author examines regulatory monitoring in detail. Four basic types of regulatory monitoring are identified: (1) monitoring performed by a polluter against his won in-house standards; (2) monitoring performed by a polluter against external standards; (3) law-enforcement monitoring performed by some government agency; (4) policy-assessment monitoring performed by government agency or independent body to investigate whether the aims of environmental policy are being achieved. These forms of monitoring may be directed at emissions, ambient levels, or effects of pollutants.
The paper examines the relationship between the types of regulatory monitoring, environmental policy, environmental management action, and the pollution abatement practice undertaken by polluters. The paper gives a complete taxonomy of monitoring types (both descriptive and regulatory), and this enables the author to construct a dynamic model showing the key role occupied by monitoring in any management system.
The author shows the applicability of the model to environmental management action based on the “best practicable means” approach as well as action based on compliance with environmental standards.
Finally the author attempts to show the validity of the model by using it to interpret the events surrounding the passing of the Clean Air Act, 1956. The model is offered as a paradigm for environmental management.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashby, E. (1977) The Leon Sloss Junior Memorial Lectures. In Ashby, E. (ed.)Reconciling Man with the Environment, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, p. 104.
Ashby, E. and Anderson, M. (1976) Studies in the politics of environmental protection: The historical roots of the British Clean Air Act, 1956: I. The awakening of public interest over industrial smoke,Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 1, 279–290.
Ashby, E. and Anderson, M. (1977a) Studies in the politics of environmental protection: The historical roots of the British Clean Air Act, 1956: II. The appeal to public opinion over domestic smoke,Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 2, 9–25.
Ashby, E. and Anderson, M. (1977b) Studies in the politics of environmental protection: The historical roots of the British Clean Air Act, 1956: III. The ripening of public opinion,Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 2, 190–206.
British Standards Institute (1967) BS 4197: 1967,A Precision Sound Level Meter (M), British Standards Institute, London.
British Standards Institute (1969a) BS 1747: 1969,Methods for the Measurement of Air Pollution, Part 2. Determination of Suspended Matter (M), Part 2, British Standards Institute, London.
British Standards Institute (1969b) BS 1747: 1969,Methods for the Measurement of Air Pollution, Part 3. Determination of Sulphur Dioxide (M), British Standards Institute, London.
Clean Air Act (1956) (4 & 5 Eliz. 2, c. 52), HMSO, London.
Clean Air Act (1968) (1968c.62) HMSO, London.
Committee on Air Pollution (1954) Chairman, Sir Hugh Beaver, HMSO, London.
Control of Noise (Measurement and Registers) Regulations (1976) S.I. 1976, No. 37, HMSO, London.
Control of Pollution Act (1974) (1974 c. 40), HMSO, London.
Dark Smoke (Permitted Periods) Regulations (1958) S.I. 1958, No. 498, HMSO, London.
Department of the Environment (1979)Digest of Environmental Pollution Statistics, HMSO, London, p. IV.
Department of Health and Social Security (1969)The Bacteriological Examination of Water Supplies: Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects, No. 71, 4th edn., HMSO, London.
Factories Act (1961) (9 & 10 Eliz. 2, c. 34), HMSO, London.
Garner, J. F. and Crow, R. K. (1976)Clean Air—Law and Practice, 4th edn., Shaw and Sons, London.
Harvey, T. E. (1981a) The monitoring paradigm of environmental control,Proceedings of the Institution of Environmental Sciences, 2 (1), 1–51.
Harvey, T. E. (1981b) Environmental Intervention: The Monitorin Paradigm—I. The Monitoring Concept and the Practice of Descriptive Monitoring.The Environmentalist, 1 (4) 283–291.
Ionising Radiations (Sealed Sources) Regulations (1969), S.I. 1969, No. 808, HMSO, London.
Ionising Radiations (Unsealed Radioactive Substances) Regulations (1968) S.I. 1968, No. 780, HMSO, London.
Lawther, P. J., Waller, R. E. and Henderson, M. (1970),Thorax, 25, 525.
Ministry of Health (1954)Mortality and Morbidity during the London Smog of December 1952, HMSO, London.
Open University (1975)Environmental Control and Public Health: Air Pollution Control, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK, p. 35.
Public Health Act (1936) (26 GEO. 5 & 1 EDW. 8, c. 49), HMSO, London.
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1974) Chairman, Sir Brian Flowers,Fourth Report—Pollution Control: Progress and Problems, HMSO, London.
Waller, R. E. (1971),J. Royal College of Physicians, 5, 362.
Warren Spring Laboratory (1966)National Survey of Smoke and Sulphur Dioxide: Instruction Manual, Warren Spring Laboratory, Stevenage.
Warren Spring Laboratory, Department of Trade and Industry (1972)National Survey of Air Pollution 1961–71, Vol. 1, HMSO, London.
Water Act (1973 c. 37), HMSO, London.
WHO (1971)International Standards for Drinking Water, (3rd edn.), WHO, Geneva.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Trevor Harvey is trained as a microbiologist specialising in pollution control. He organised the international course ‘Environmental Pollution, Monitoring and Control’ which was sponsored by UNESCO, UNEP and WHO. This has become a prototype for training programmes in many Third World countries.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harvey, T. Environmental intervention: The monitoring Paradigm. Environmentalist 2, 307–319 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02603088
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02603088