Skip to main content
Log in

Surface-texture measurement and characterisation with applications to machine-tool monitoring

  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a comprehensive review is given of surface-texture measurement methods, characterisation of surfaces, surface finish and machine-condition monitoring using surface-texture information. A comparative evaluation of surface-texture modelling is provided. Directions in the areas of surface-texture research are also identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. R. Thomas (ed.),Rough Surfaces, Longman Inc. New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Shiraishi, “Scope of in-process measurement, monitoring and control techniques in machining processes. Part 1: Inprocess techniques for tools”,Precision Engineering,10(4), pp. 179–189, 1988.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Shiraishi, “Scope of in-process measurement, monitoring and control techniques in machining processes. Part 2: Inprocess techniques for workpieces”,Precisions Engineering,11(1), pp. 27–37, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Shiraishi, “Scope of in-process measurement, monitoring and control techniques in machining processes. Part 3: Inprocess techniques for cutting processes and machine tools”,Precision Engineering,11(1), pp. 39–47, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P. M. Lister and G. Barrow, “Tool condition monitoring systems”,Proceedings of 27th International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference pp. 271–288, 1986.

  6. R. D. Young, T. V. Vorburger and E. C. Teague, “In-process and on-line measurement of surface finish”,Annals of the CIRP,29(1), pp. 435–440, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. V. Vorburger and E. C. Teague, “Optical techniques for on-line measurement of surface topography”,Precision Engineering,3(2), pp. 61–83, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. J. Whitehouse, “Surface metrology instrumentation”,Journal of Physics. E Scientific Instruments,20, pp. 1145–1155, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Spiewak and H. Kaliszer, “In-process measurement of roughness in plunge grinding operation”,Proceedings of 24th International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, pp. 331–338, 1983.

  10. J. F. Zakrajsek, W. J. Atherton and P. M. Flanagan, “In-situ surface quality detection during grinding operations using piezoelectric sensors”,Proceedings of First International Machinery Monitoring and Diagnostics Conference. Las Vegas, USA. pp. 17–22, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Shiraishi and S. Sato, “Dimensional and surface roughness controls in a turning operation”,ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,112, pp. 78–83, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. J. Gasvik, “Moiré technique” inOptical Metrology, John Wiley, pp. 117–144, 1987.

  13. M. R. Morshedizadeh and C. M. Wykes, “Optical measurement of surface form using computer generated referencing”,Journal of Physics. E. Scientific Instruments,22, pp. 88–92, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Uchida, H. Sato and M. H-hori, “Two dimensional measurement of surface roughness by the light sectioning method”,Annals of the CIRP,28(1), pp. 419–423, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. H. Goh, N. Phillips and R. Bell, “The applicability of a laser triangulation probe to non-contacting inspection”,International Journal of Production Research,24(6), pp. 1331–1348, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. L. Church, H. A. Jenkinson and J. M. Zavada, “Relationship between surface scattering and microtopographic features”,Optical Engineering,18, p. 125, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Brodmann and G. Thurn, “Roughness measurement of ground, turned and shot-peened surfaces by the light scattering methods”,Wear,109, pp. 1–13, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. I. Sakai and M. Sawabe, “A method for surface roughness measurement by means of light reflectance”,Bulletin of Japan Society of Precision Engineering,16(2), pp. 123–124, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  19. F. Luk, V. M. Huynh and W. North, “Application of spatial spectral analysis to in-line machine inspection of surface roughness”,Proceedings of 9th International Conf. on Production Research, Cincinnati, USA, pp. 450–460, 1987.

  20. F. Luk, V. Huynh and W. North, “Measurement of surface roughness by a machine vision system”,Journal of Physics. E Scientific Instruments,22, pp. 977–980, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Sakai, O. Ogata and S. Asai, “Optical measuring instrument for chatter marks”,Annals of the CIRP,33(1), pp. 407–412, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. R. Pryor, R. Reynolds and W. Pastorius, “D-Sight: a whole-field optical technique for determination of surface form deviation”,Surface Topography,1, pp. 183–193, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. T. Kohno, N. Ozawa, K. Miyamoto and T. Musha, “High precision optical surface sensor”,Applied Optics,27(1), pp. 103–108, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. J. Whitehouse, “Assessment of surface finish profiles produced by multi-process manufacturing”,Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,199(B4), pp. 263–270, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Adachi, H. Miki, Y. Nakal and I. Kawaguchi, “Optical precision profilometer using the differential method”,Optics Letters,12(10), pp. 792–794, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. Kaplan, “Noncontact surface profiling”,Photonics Spectra, pp. 78–82, April 1989.

  27. H. E. Bennett and J. O. Porteus, “Relation between surface roughness and specular reflectance at normal incidence”,Journal of the Optical Society of America,51, (2), pp. 123–128, 1961.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. P. Beckmann and A. Spizzichino,The Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves from Rough Surfaces. Pergamon Press, New York, 1963.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. E. G. Thwaite, “Power spectra of rough surfaces obtained by optical Fourier transformation”,Annals of the CIRP,29(1), pp. 419–422, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  30. E. G. Thwaite, “The extension of optical angular settering techniques to the measurement of intermediate scale roughness”,Annals of the CIRP,31(1), pp. 463–465, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. G. Thwaite, “A quantitative comparison of the wavelength spectrum of a surface obtained by optical Fourier transformation with calculations from profile measurements”,Wear,83, pp. 181–187, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. R. Brodmann, G. Rodenstock and G. Thurn, “An optical instrument for measuring the surface roughness in production control”,Annals of the CIRP,33(1), pp. 403–406, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. Kurada, “Study of surface texture using Fourier transform methods”, M. A. Sc. thesis, University of Windsor, Canada, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  34. P. J. Chandley, “Determination of the autocorrelation function of height on a rough surface from coherent light scattering”,Optical and quantum Electronics,8, pp. 329–333, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. J. H. Rakels, “The use of Bessel functions to extend the range of optical diffraction techniques for in-process surface finish measurements of high precision turned parts”,Journal of Physics. E Scientific Instruments,19, pp. 76–79, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. D. J. Jansson, J. M. Rourke and A. C. Bell, “High-speed surface roughness measurement”,ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,106, pp. 34–39, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  37. H. Murray, “Exploratory investigation of laser methods for grinding research”,Annals of the CIRP,22(1), pp. 137–138, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  38. M. Shiraishi, “In-process measurement of surface roughness in turning by laser beams”,ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,103, pp. 202–209, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. M. Shiraishi, “A consideration of surface roughness measurement by optical method”,ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,109, pp. 100–105, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  40. W. P. T. North and A. K. Agarwal, “Surface roughness measurement with fiber-optics”,ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control,105, pp. 295–297, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  41. J. Y. Zhu and A. A. Shumsheruddin, “Optical technique for in-process measurement of surface roughness during ACC grinding”,Proceedings of 22nd International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, pp. 177–184, 1981.

  42. J. Q. Whitley, R. P. Kusy, M. J. Mayhew and J. E. Buckthal, “Surface roughness of stainless steel and electroformed nickel standards using a HeNe laser”,Optics and Laser Technology,19(4), pp. 189–196, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. D. Spurgeon and R. A. C. Slater, “In-process indication of surface roughness using a fiber-optics transducer”,Proceedings of 15th International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, pp. 339–347, 1974.

  44. I. Inasaki, “Development of in-process sensor for surface roughness measurement”,Proceedings of 23rd International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, pp. 109–113, 1982.

  45. E. C. Teague, T. V. Vorburger and D. Maystre, “Light scattering from manufactured surfaces”,Annals of the CIRP,30(2), pp. 563–569, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  46. P. M. Lonardo, “Testing a new optical sensor for in-process detection of surface roughness”,Annals of the CIRP,27(1), pp. 531–534, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  47. M. W. Williams, K. C. Ludema and D. M. Hildreth, “Mueller matrix cllipsometry of practical surfaces”,Surface Topography,1, pp. 357–372, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  48. T. V. Vorburger and K. C. Ludema, “Ellipsometry of rough surfaces”,Applied Optics,19(4), pp. 561–573, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  49. F. C. Tenoudji and G. Quentin, “Characterization of surfaces by deconvolution of ultrasonic echoes using extended bandwidth”,Journal of Applied Physics,53(6), pp. 4057–4063, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. G. V. Blessing and D. G. Eitzen, “Surface roughness sensed by ultrasound”,Surface Topography,1, pp. 143–158, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  51. J. L. Garbini, L. J. Albrecht, J. E. Jorgensen and G. F. Mauer, “Surface profilometry based on fringing capacitance measurement”,ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control,107, pp. 192–199, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  52. G. Sathyanarayanan and V. Radhakrishnan, “Roughness measurement with non-contacting inductive pickup”,Manufacturing Metrology, ASME PED,29, pp. 75–100, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  53. R. C. Spragg and D. J. Whitehouse, “An average wavelength parameter for surface metrology”,Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control,5(3), pssp. 972–979, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  54. G. H. Schaffer, “The many faces of surface texture”,American Machinist and Automated Manufacturing, pp. 61–68, June 1988.

  55. D. J. Mulvaney, D. E. Newland and K. F. Gill, “A comparison of orthogonal transforms in their application to surface texture analysis”,Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,200(C6), pp. 407–414, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  56. A. Ber and S. Braun, “Spectral analysis of surface finish”,Annals of the CIRP,16, pp. 53–59, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  57. M. Brock, “Fourier analysis of surface roughness”,Bruel & Kjaers Technical Review,3, pp. 3–45, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  58. D. J. Mulvaney, D. E. Newland and K. F. Gill, “Identification of surface roughness”,Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,199(C4), pp. 281–286, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  59. D. J. Whitehouse, “Beta functions for surface typologies?”,Annals of the CIRP,27(1), pp. 491–497, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  60. P. J. Scott, “Developments in surface texture measurement”,Surface Topography,1, pp. 373–383, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  61. J. Peters, P. Vanherck and M. Sastrodinoto, “Assessment of surface typology analysis techniques”,Annals of the CIRP,28(2), pp. 539–554, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  62. A. Prakash, K. Struik and J. Koning, “Surface roughness: the measurement of spark erosion reference standards”,International Journal of Production Research,13(3), pp. 291–302, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  63. T. R. Thomas, “Correlation analysis of the structure of ground surface”,Proceedings of 13th International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, pp. 303–306, 1972.

  64. J. H. M. Ledocq, “The anisotropic texture of machine components”,Proceedings of 18th International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, pp. 641–648, 1977.

  65. W. R. deVries, “A three-dimensional model of surface asperities developed using moment theory”,ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,104, pp. 343–348, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Y. Tanimura, E. C. Teague, F. E. Scire, R. D. Young and T. V. Vorburger, “Graphical signatures for manufacturing surfaces”,ASME Journal of Lubrication Technology,104, pp. 533–537, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. S. M. Pandit, “Characteristic shapes and wavelength decomposition of surfaces in machining”,Annals of the CIRP,30(1)s, pp. s 487–492, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  68. I. Sherrington and E. H. Smith, “Fourier models of the surface topography of engineering components”,Surface Topography,1, pp. 167–181, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  69. R. E. DeVor and S. M. Wu, “Surface profile characterization by autoregressive moving-average models”,ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,94, pp. 825–832, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  70. D. J. Whitehouse, “The generation of two dimensional random surfaces having a specified function”,Annals of the CIRP,32(1), pp. 495–498, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  71. W. Watson and A. Woods, “The 3-D representation of engineering surfaces”,Surface Topography,1, pp. 11–28, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  72. S. M. Pandit, F. Nassirpour and S. M. Wu, “Stochastic geometry of anisotropic random surfaces with application to coated abrasives”,ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,99 pp. 218–224, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  73. S. M. Wu and J. Ni, “Precision machining without precise machinery”,Annals of the CIRP,38(1), pp. 533–536, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  74. G. Staufert, “Characterization of random roughness profiles—a comparison of AR-modeling technique and profile description by means of commonly used parameters”,Annals of the CIRP,28(1), pp. 431–435, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  75. T. S. Sankar and M. O. M. Osman, “Profile characterization of manufactured surfaces using random function excursion technique. Part 1: Theory”,ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,97, pp. 190–195, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  76. M. O. M. Osman and T. S. Sankar, “Profile characterization of manufactured surfaces using random function excursion techniques. Part 2: Application”,ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,97, pp. 196–202, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  77. A. A. Elgabry, M. O. M. Osman and T. S. Sankar, “On the use of theR a, AMS and RMS values for the simulation of fine machines surfaces”,International Journal of Production Research,5, pp. 571–581, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  78. R. S. Hamed, D. J. Whitehouse and T. C. Bittery, “Random surface generation—an integrated approach”,Annals of the CIRP,27(1), pp. 499–504, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  79. C. T. Ansell and J. Taylor, “The surface finishing properties of a carbide and ceramic cutting tool”,Proceedings of Third International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, pp. 225–243, 1962.

  80. H. Takeyama and T. Ono, “Study on roughness of turned surfaces”,Bulletin of Japan Society of Precision Engineering,1(4), pp. 274–280, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  81. A. F. Allen and R. C. Brewer, “The influence of machine tool variability and tool flank wear on surface texture”,Proceedings of Sixth International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, pp. 301–305, 1965.

  82. D. Gillibrand and W. B. Heginbotham, “Experimental observations on surface roughness in metal machining”,Proceedings of 18th International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, Las Vegas, USA. pp. 629–640, 1977.

  83. H. Zhang, X. Chen and R. Chen, “The control of surface roughness with expert system controller”,Proceedings of First International Machinery Monitoring and Diagnostics Conference, Las Vegas, USA. pp. 813–817, 1989.

  84. H. Zhang, X. Chen and R. Chen, “The recognition and control of tool wear with the measurement of machining quality”,Proceedings of First International Machinery Monitoring and Diagnostics Conference, Las Vegas, USA, pp. 112–115, 1989.

  85. M. Weck and K. Modemann, “Surface quality as a function of static and dynamic machine-tool behaviour during the cutting process”,Surface Topography,1, pp. 255–265, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  86. S. M. Pandit and S. Revach, “A data dependent systems approach to dynamics of surface generation in turning”,ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,103, pp. 437–445, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  87. A. Bhattacharyya, R. Faria-Gonzalez and I. Ham, “Regression analysis for predicting surface finish and its application in the determination of optimum machining conditions”,ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,91, pp. 711–714, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  88. K. Taraman and B. Lambert, “A surface roughness model for a turning operation”,International Journal of Production Research,12(6), pp. 691–703, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  89. M. S. Sekvam and V. Radhakrishnan, “Determination of the direct and indirect influences of groove wear and built-up edge on surface roughness in turning by multiple correlation technique”,International Journal of Production Research,14(3), pp. 415–420, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  90. R. M. Sundaram and B. K. Lambert, “Surface roughness variability of AISI 4140 steel in fine turning using carbide tools”,International Journal of Production Research,17(3), pp. 249–258, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  91. R. M. Sundaram and B. K. Lambert, “Mathematical models to predict surface in fine turning of steel”,International Journal of Production Research,19(5), pp. 547–564, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  92. A. Mital and M. Mehta, “Surface finish prediction models for fine turning”,International Journal of Production Research,26(12), pp. 1861–1876, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  93. T. Sata, M. Li, S. Takata, H. Hiraoka, C. Q. Li, X. Z. Xing and X. G. Xiao, “Analysis of surface roughness generation in turning operation and its applications”,Annals of the CIRP,34(1), pp. 473–476, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  94. A. Konczakowski and J Peklenik, “Turning lathes condition monitoring based on workpiece surface spectral analysis”,Condition Monitoring '84, Proceedings of International Conference on Condition Monitoring, Swansea, UK. pp. 279–292, 1984.

  95. D. A. Dornfeld and R. Y. Fei, “In process surface finish characterization”,Manufacturing Simulation and Processes, ASME PED,20, pp. 191–204, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  96. P. K. R. Rao and M. S. Shunmugam, “Accuracy and surface finish in BTA drilling”,International Journal of Production Research,25(1), pp. 31–44, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  97. B. J. Griffiths, “Manufacturing surface design and monitoring for performance”,Surface Topography,1, pp. 333–341, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  98. S. Chandrashekhar, J. Frazao, T. S. Sankar and M. O. M. Osman, “On the stochastic desription of the tool tip motion and its influence on the surface texture in BTA deep hole machining piece”,Manufacturing Simulation Processes, ASME PED,20, pp. 151–175, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  99. R. P. Lindsay, “On the surface finish-metal removal relationsihp in precision grinding”,ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,95, pp. 815–820, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  100. P. K. Basuray, B. Sahay and G. K. Lal, “Surface generated in fine grinding. Part 1: Statistical model. Part 2: Radial distribution parameter and simulated surface profile”,International Journal of Production Research,19(6), pp. 677–702, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  101. S. M. Pandit and G. Sathyanaryanan, “A model for surface grinding based on abrasive geometry and elasticity”,ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,104, pp. 349–357, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  102. G. Sathyanarayanan and S. M. Pandit, “Fracture and attritious wear rate in grinding by data dependent systems”,13th North American Manufacturing Research Conference Proceedings, Berkeley, USA, May 19–22, pp. 314–320, 1985.

  103. A. Villa, S. Rosetto and R. Levi, “Surface texture and machine conditions. Part 1: Model building logic in view of process control”,ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,105, pp. 259–263, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  104. A. Villa, G. Murrai and R. Levi, “Surface texture and machine conditions. Part 2: Development of mathematical model bsed upon pattern recognition”,ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,105, pp. 264–269, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  105. J. Raja, “Field testing of machine tool diagnostic techniques using surface metrology”,Annals of the CIRP,32(1), pp. 503–506, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. J. Raja and D. J. Whitehouse, “An investigation into the possibility of using surface profiles for machine tool surveillance”,International Journal of Production Research,22(3), pp. 453–466, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  107. J. Atkinson and C. F. Noble, “The surface finish resulting from peripheral electro-chemical grinding”Proceedings of 22nd International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, pp. 371–378, 1981.

  108. O. V. K. Chetty, R. V. G. K. Murthy and V. Radhakrishnan, “On some aspects of surface formation in ECM”,ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry,103, pp. 341–348, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. M. Komaraiah, M. A. Manan, P. N. Reddy and S. Victor, “Investigation of surface roughness and accuracy in ultrasonic machining”,Precision Engineering,10(2), pp. 59–65, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huynh, V.M., Fan, Y. Surface-texture measurement and characterisation with applications to machine-tool monitoring. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 7, 2–10 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602945

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602945

Keywords

Navigation