Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Accuracy of the disk method for determining antimicrobic susceptibility of common Gram-negative bacilli

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A standardized disk susceptibility test was evaluated by comparing results with minimal inhibitory concentrations obtained with agar dilution methods. The agar overlay method was used to test 152 Gram-negative bacilli against eight different antimicrobial agents. One to 3% of the isolates were resistant to an antimicrobic by the MIC method, but appeared to be susceptible by the disk method. Most very major discrepancies involved disk tests withProteus sp., a microorganism notoriously difficult to test reproducibly.Serratia sp. vs. the polymyxins andKlebsiella sp. vs. nitrofurantoin accounted for most other major discrepancies. With other microorganism-drug combinations, the disk test was a reasonably accurate technique for classifying bacteria into resistant or susceptible categories. Gentamicin disk tests were unsatisfactory, but when an intermediate zone category of 13–16 mm was applied, the false susceptible test results were reduced to 2.6%. Intermediate zone sizes were obtained with 6% of the disk tests; most of those isolates were resistant or susceptible but not intermediate in susceptibility. About 11% of the strains had intermediate MICs (5–20% with different drugs), but most of those strains were fully susceptible by the disk technique. *** DIRECT SUPPORT *** A01R4011 00007

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Barry, A. L. 1976. The antimicrobic susceptibility test: Principles and practices. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barry, A. L. 1977. Standardized disc diffusion methods for antimicrobic susceptibility testing of common rapid-growing bacteria, pp. 9–20. In: Bondi, A., Bartola, J. T., Prier, J. E. (eds). The clinical laboratory as an aid in chemotherapy for infectious disease. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barry, A. L., Garcia, F., Thrupp, L. D. 1970. An improved single-disk method for testing the antibiotic susceptibility for rapidly growing pathogens. American Journal of Clinical Pathology53:149–158.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barry, A. L., Jones, R. N., Gavan, T. L. 1978. Evaluation of the Micro-media system for quantitative antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing: A collaborative study. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy13:61–69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Barry, A. L., Schoenknecht, F. D., Shadomy, S., Sherris, J. C., Thornsberry, C., Washington, J. A., Kramer, R. B. 1978. Interlaboratory variability of disc diffusion and agar dilution susceptibility tests with cefamandole and cephalothin. Current Microbiology1:277–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barry, A. L., Thrupp, L. D. 1969. Problems in evaluating nitrofurantoin susceptibility tests with Klebsiella-Enterobacter. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy1968:415–421.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bauer, A. W., Kirby, W. M. M., Sherris, J. C., Turck, M. 1966. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology45:493–496.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, S. D., Washington, J. A. 1978. Evaluation of the Repliscan system for identification ofEnterobacteriaceae. Journal of Clinical Microbiology8:695–699.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ericsson, H. M., Sherris, J. C. 1971. Antibiotic sensitivity testing: Report of an international collaborative study. Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica, Suppl. B217:1–90.

    Google Scholar 

  10. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1975. Performance standards for antimicrobial disc susceptibility tests. Villanova, Pennsylvania: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thornsberry, C., Gavan, T. L., Gerlach, E. H. 1977. New developments in antimicrobial agent susceptibility testing. Cumitech 6. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Turck, M., Lindemeyer, R. E., Petersdorf, R. G. 1963. Comparison of single disc and tube dilution technique in determining antibiotic sensitivities of Gram-negative pathogens. Annals of Internal Medicine58:56–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. 1972. FDA rules and regulations: Antibiotic susceptibility dises. Federal Register37:20525–20529.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Washington, J. A. 1974. The agar dilution technique, pp. 54–62. In: Balows, A. (ed.), Current techniques for antibiotic susceptibility testing, Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Microbiology Laboratories, University of California Davis Medical Center, 95817, Sacramento, California, USA

    Arthur L. Barry

  2. Departments of Pathology and Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, 95616, Davis, California, USA

    Lee J. Effinger

Authors
  1. Arthur L. Barry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lee J. Effinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barry, A.L., Effinger, L.J. Accuracy of the disk method for determining antimicrobic susceptibility of common Gram-negative bacilli. Current Microbiology 2, 305–309 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602865

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602865

Keywords

Search

Navigation