Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of associated malformations on survival rate of surgically uncomplicated esophageal atresia cases

Einfluß der assoziierten Mißbildungen auf die Überlebensrate von chirurgisch unkomplizierten Ösophagusatresiefällen

  • Main Topics: “Current Topics in Pediatric Surgery”
  • Published:
Acta Chirurgica Austriaca Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of birthweight, gestational age, and associated malformations on the survival rate was studied in cases of uncomplicated esophageal atresia. A collective of 66 infants (birthweight: 2856.9±506 g; gestational age: 38.9±1.5 weeks) was randomly selected from a registry we established on esophageal atresia, and which currently involves 311 infants. The inclusion criteria were: 1) birth data after January 1975, and neonatal intensive care, 2) primary end-to-end anastomosis with fistula closure to provide comparable surgical procedures, 3) no neonatal complications to exclude a possible influence on the mortality rate. The mortality rate of the whole collective was 7.6%. All 42 patients without associated malformations survived (birthweight: 2871.1±482 g; gestational age: 38.9±1.5 weeks). The 24 cases with associated malformations, however, had a mortality rate of 20.8%; the infants who died had mean birthweights of 2684±796 g, and gestational ages of 38.1±1 weeks. Thus associated congenital malformations turned out to have a significant influence on the mortality rate of cases with esophageal atresia (p=0.0017). In a further, separate analysis of the particular malformations, cardiac malformations were found to be the only ones that significantly influenced mortality (p=0.0001). The gestational age and weight at birth were not predictive of the lemortality rate in cases of uncomplicated esophageal atresia, whereas the association with cardiac malformations significantly reduced the chances of survival.

Zusammenfassung

In dieser Studie wurde der Einfluß des Geburtsgewichtes, des Gestationsalters und der assoziierten Mißbildungen auf die Überlebensrate von chirurgisch problemlosen Ösophagusatresiefällen untersucht. 66 Patienten (Geburtsgewicht: 2856.9±506 g, Gestationsalter: 38,9±1,5 Wochen) wurden nach folgenden Kriterien aus einem 312 Fälle umfassenden Register ausgewählt: 1. Geburtsdatum nach 1975 und intensivmedizinische Betreuung, 2. primäre End-zu-End-Anastomose mit Fistelverschluß als einheitliches Operationsverfahren, 3. keine neonatalen Komplikationen, um einen möglichen individuellen Einfluß auf die Letalität auszuschalten. Die Letalität betrug insgesamt 7,6%, wobei die 42 Fälle (Geburtsgewicht: 2871,1±482 g, Gestationsalter: 38,9±1,5 Wochen) ohne assoziierte Mißbildung überlebten, und 20,8% der 24 Fälle mit assoziierter Mißbildung verstarben. Das Geburtsgewicht der Verstorbenen war 2684±796 g und das Gestationsalter 38,8±1 Woche. Assoziierte Mißbildungen beeinflußten signifikant die Letalität dieser Ösophagusatresiefälle (p=0,0017). Bei weiterer detaillierter Prüfung der assoziierten Mißbildungen zeigten nur kardiale Malformationen einen signifikanten Einfluß auf die Letalität (p=0,0001). Sowohl das Gestationsalter als auch das Geburtsgewicht hatten keine Letalitätsrelevanz. Nur die assoziierten kardialen Mißbildungen mindern signifikant die Überlebenschance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beasley SW, Myers NA: Trends in mortality in oesophageal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 1992;7:86–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Biller JA, Allen JL, Schuster SR, et al: Long-term evaluation of esophageal and pulmonary function in patients with repaired esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula. Dig Dis Sci 1987;32:985–990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Connolly B, Guiney EJ: Trends in tracheoesophageal fistula. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987;164:308–312.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ein SH, Shandling B, Wesson DE, et al: Esophageal atresia with distal tracheoesophageal fistula: associated anomalies and prognosis in the 1980s. J Pediatr Surg 1989;24:1055–1059.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ein SH, Shandling B, Simpson JS, et al: Fourteen years of gastric tubes. J Pediatr Surg 1978;13:638–642.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Filston HC, Rankin JS, Grimm JK: Esophageal atresia: prognostic factors and contribution of preoperative telescopic endoscopy. Ann Surg 1984;199:532–537.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Freeman NV, Cass DT: Colon interposition: a modification of the Waterston technique using the normal esophageal route. J Pediatr Surg 1982;17:17–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. German JC, Waterston DJ: Colon interposition for the replacement of the esophagus in children. J Pediatr Surg 1976;11:227–234.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hight DW, McGowan G, Smith J, et al: Atresia of the esophagus: new trens in the management of high-risk neonates. Arch Surg 1987;122:421–423.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Holder TM, Asheraft KW, Sharp RJ, et al: Care of infants with esophageal atresia, tracheoesophageal fistula and associated anomalies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987;94:828–835.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Louhimo I, Lindahl H: Esophageal atresia: primary results of 500 consecutively treated patients. J Pediatr Surg 1983;18:217–229.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marujo WC, Tannuri U, Maksoud JG: Total gastric transposition: an alternative to esophageal replacement in children. J Pediatr Surg 1991;26:678–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O'Neill JA, Holcomb GW, Neblett WW: Recent experience with esophageal atresia. Ann Surg 1982;195:739–745.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Poenaru D, Laberge JM, Neilson IR, et al.: A more than 25-year experience with end-to-end versus end-to-side repair for esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 1991;26:472–477.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pursley DWM, Cloherty JP: Identifying the high-risk newborn and evaluating gestational age, prematurity, postmaturity, large-for-gestational-age, and small-for-gestational-age infants, in Cloherty JP, Stark AR (eds). Manual of neonatal care. Boston-Toronto-London, Little, Brown and Company, 1991, pp 92–94.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ring WS, Varco RL, LtHeureux PR, et al: Esophageal replacement with jejunum in children. An 18 to 33 year follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 83:918–927.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rokitansky AM, Kolankaya AAV, Seidl S, et al: Recent evaluation of prognostic risk factors in esophageal atresia—a multicenter review of 223 cases. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1993;3:196–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vogt EG: Congenital esophageal atresia. Am J Roentgenol 1929;22:463–469.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Waterston DJ, Bonham-Carter RE, Aberdeen E: Oesophageal atresia, tracheoesophageal fistula—a study of survival in 21 8 infants. Lancet 1962;1:819–822.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rokitansky, A., Kolankaya, A., Mayr, J. et al. Influence of associated malformations on survival rate of surgically uncomplicated esophageal atresia cases. Acta Chir Austriaca 25, 377–380 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602149

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02602149

Key-words

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation