Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Vergleichende Anastomosentechnik

Comparative techniques of anastomoses—invagination anastomosis and single-layered inverted anastomosis

Invaginationsanastomose und einschichtig invertierende Anastomose

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Acta Chirurgica Austriaca Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Vergleich von 2 Dick darmanastomosen im Tierversuch beim Hausschwein: die einschichtig invertierende und die sogenannte Invaginations-oder Teleskopanastomose.

Technik, Berstungsdruckmessungen und Histologic waren die wichtigsten Parameter in der Beurteilung der Anastomosengüte. Lumeneinengung, Mikroabszesse und Fadengranulome wurden bei der herkömmlichen, einschichtig invertierenden Anastomose im Gegensatz zur Invaginationsanastomose beobachtet.

Summary

Surgical test series on pigs comparing two different techniques of colon anastomoses: the single-layered inverted anastomosis and the so-called invagination or telescopic anastomosis.

Focal points in judging their quality were: technique, testing of the bursting pressure and histology. Whereas the traditional inverting single-layered anastomosis produced narrowing of the lumina, micro-abscesses and thread granulomas, the invagination anastomosis produced no such symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Adam, H., Czihak, G.: Arbeitsmethoden der makroskopischen Anatomie S. 583. Fischer, Stuttgart 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beahrs, O. H.:Low anterior resection for cancer of the rectosigmoid and rectum. Surg. Clin. North Am. 47, 971 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becker H, Probst M., Ungeheuer, E.:Die maschinelle Anastomose nach anteriorer Rectumresection. Chirurg 51, 341 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernard, E. F.: Colorectal Anastomosis by Invagination. National Library Week, April 17–23, 1966.

  5. Burson, L. C., Berliner, St. D., Strauss, R. J., Katz, P., Wise, L.: Telescoping Anastomosis of the Colon. Dis. Col. Rect. 22, 111 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carlier: Persönliche Mitteilung über 40 Fäll. Hopital Saint-Georges, Mons/Belgique, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Collins, J. P., Butterfield, D.: The results of Colonic Anastomoses at the Royal Melbourne Hospital. Aust. N. Z. J. Surg, 48, 409 (1978).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Czerny, V., zit. in: Lindenmuth, W. W., My, C. J.: Anastomoses in the alimentary tract using a serosa muscular tubular cyff technic: Aus der Heidelberger Chirurgischen Klinik—Zur Darmresection. Berl. klin. Wschr. 44, 637 (1880).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eichfuß, H. P., Kremer, B., Lierse, W., Schreiber, H. W.: Chirurgische Nahtlager am Rumpfdam. Akt. Chir.17, 25 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Engels, M.: Die kolo-kolische Invaginationsanastomose. Colo-Proctology 3, 146 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gill, W, Fraser, J., Carter, D. C., Hill, R.: Everted intestinal anastomosis. Surg. Gyn. Obst, 1297 (1969).

  12. Goepel, R.:Telescopic anastomosis. Zbl. Chir. 13, 777 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goligher, J. C., Graham, N. G., de Dombal, F. T.: Anastomotic dehiscence after anterior resection of rectum and sigmoid. Br. J. Surg. 57, 109 (1970).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Halsted, W. S.: Circular suture of the intestine—an experimental study. Am. J. Med. Sci. 94, 436 (1887).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Healey jr., J. E. McBride, Ch. M., Gallager, H. St.: Is serosato-serosa approximation necessary in intestinal anastomosis? Surgical Forum, p. 297, Gastrointestinal Problems, 1962.

  16. Kerscher, P., Wünschr, P. H., Steidl, H.: Naht der Submucosa bei der Dickdarmanastomose. Chirurg 50, 770 (1979).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirkegaard, P., Christensen, A. B., Ibsen, J., Hegedüs, V., Christiansen, J.: Experimental Nonsuture Colonic Anastomoses. Am. J. Surg. 139, 233 (1980).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lembert, M. A.:Memoire sur l'enteroraphie avec la description d'un procede nouveau pour pratiquer cette operation chirurgical. Repertoire General d'Anatomie et Physiologie Pathologiques 1, 2, 100 (1826).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lindenmuth, W. W., May, C. J.: Anastomoses in the Alimentary Tract Using a Sero-Muscular Tubular Cuff Technic. Ann. Surg. 165, 590 (1967).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Linn, B. S., Reisman, T. M., Yurt, R. W., Polk Jr., H. C.: Intestinal Anastomosis by Invagination: A historical review of a „new” technic with controlled study of its potential. Ann. Surg. 167, 393 (1968).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Loeb, M. J.: Comparative strength of inverted, everted, and end-on intestinal anastomoses. Surg. Gyn. Obst. XX, 301 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  22. O'Neill, P., Healey Jr., J. E., Clark, R. L., Gallager, H., St.: Nonsuture intestinal anastomosis. Am. J. Surg. 104, 761 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schrock, T. R., Deveney, C. W., Dunphy, J. E.: Factors contributing in the gastrointestinal tract. Ann. Surg. 175, 815 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schrock, T. R., Deveney, C. W., Dunphy, J. E.: Factors contributing to leakage of colonic anastomoses. Ann. Surg. 177, 513 (1973).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shrum, R. C., Willimas, G. S., Allen jr., M. S., Kenneweg, D. J.: A Simplified technique of ileocolostomy. Virginia Medical Monthly 92, 515 (1965).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kinderchirurgische Abteilung der Landeskrankenanstalten Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, A-5020, Salzburg

    M. Engels

  2. Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institut für Experimentelle und Gastroenterologische Chirurgie Salzburg-Hallein, Krankenhaus, A-5400, Bürgermeisterstraße 34, Hallein

    H. Klozenbücher & A. Trost

  3. Zoologisches Institut der Universität Salzburg, Akademiestraße 26, A-5020, Salzburg

    R. A. Patzner

Authors
  1. M. Engels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Klozenbücher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Trost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. A. Patzner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engels, M., Klozenbücher, H., Trost, A. et al. Vergleichende Anastomosentechnik. Acta Chir Austriaca 14, 95–99 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02601869

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02601869

Schlüsselwörter

Key-words

Search

Navigation