Skip to main content
Log in

Are computer diagnostic assistants useful tools for clinicians and educators?

  • Editorials
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bacchus CM, Quinton C, O’Rourke K, Detsky AS. A randomized crossover trial of Quick Medical Reference (QMR) as a teaching tool for medical interns. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:616–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:135–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berner ES, Webster GD, Shugerman AA, et al. Performance of four computer-based diagnostic systems. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1792–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnett GO, Cimino JJ, Hupp JA, Hoffer EP. DXplain. An evolving diagnostic decision-support system. JAMA. 1987;258:67–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sutton GC. Computer-aided diagnosis: a review. Br J Surg. 1989;76:82–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shortliffe EH. Computer programs to support clinical decision making. JAMA. 1987;258:61–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeWitt, D.E., Kanter, A.S. Are computer diagnostic assistants useful tools for clinicians and educators?. J Gen Intern Med 9, 653–654 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600314

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600314

Navigation