Skip to main content
Log in

Late-life depression in primary care

How well are we doing?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To discover primary care physicians’ attitudes toward their abilities to detect and treat depression in the elderly.

DESIGN: A self-administered questionnaire sent to 1,000 primary care physicians in the state of Michigan.

SETTING: The survey was sent to physicians who practice general internal medicine or family medicine.

PARTICIPANTS: The questionnaire was sent to 500 MD and 500 DO physicians; equal representation was given to general internal medicine and family medicine. Of all 1,000 physicians, 60% (n=604) responded, 51% (n=309) were MD’s, 48% (n=295) were DO’s, 41% (n=245) were general internists, and 59% (n=359) were family medicine physicians.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Despite positive attitudes about their skills for detecting and treating depression in the elderly, only one quarter of the respondents routinely used a screening tool in practice. Forty-one percent of all physicians were not aware of depression practice guidelines. Family physicians were more confident about their treatment skills than were general internists (85% vs 50%;x 2=11.42,p≤.003). Male physicians more often endorsed pharmacologic treatment, while female physicians more frequently used counseling and exercise techniques to treat depressed older patients. Half of all physicians felt knowledgeable about community resources to treat older depressed patients.

CONCLUSIONS: This survey identified several perceived needs for future targeted interventions: (1) additional Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guideline exposure for all primary care physicians, (2) targeted counseling skill intervention for male physicians and medication management for female physicians, and (3) additional continuing medical education intervention for practicing general internists. Further research is needed to correlate physician attitudes with ensuing behaviors to fully appreciate the nature of late-life depression treatment within the primary care arena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rapp SR, Parisi SA, Wallace CE. Comorbid psychiatric disorders in elderly medical patients: a 1-year prospective study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:124–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wells KB, Stewart A, Hays RD, et al. The functioning and well-being of depressed patients: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1989;262:914–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheah KC, Beard OW. Psychiatric findings in the population of ageriatric evaluation unit: implications. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1980;28:29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nielsen AC, Williams TA. Depression in ambulatory medical patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1980;37:999–1004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Callahan CM, Nienaber NA, Hendrie HC, Tierney WM. Depression in elderly outpatients: primary care physician’s attitudes and practice patterns. J Gen Intern Med. 1992,7:26–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Main DS, Lutz LJ, Barrett JE, Matthew J, Miller RS. The role of primary care clinician attitudes, beliefs and training in the diagnosis and treatment of depression. Arch Fam Med. 1993;2:1061–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brody DS, Larson DB. The role of primary care physicians in managing depression. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:244–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Callahan CM, Hendrie HC, Dittus RS, Brater DC, Hui SL, Tierney WM. Improving treatment of late life depression in primary care: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:839–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Epi Info, version b. A word-processing, database, and statistics program for public health on IBM-compatible micro computers. Atlanta, GA: The Division of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Epidemiology Program Office, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1994.

  10. Depression Guideline Panel. Depression in Primary Care: Volume 1, Detection and Diagnosis; Volume 2, Treatment of Major Depression. Clinical Practice Guideline, Number 5. AHCPR Publication No. 93-0551. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1993;95–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gilligan C. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA. Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol. 1986;5:165–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendeson M, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:561–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Kroenke K, et al. Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care: the PRIME-MD 1000 study. JAMA. 1995;272:1749–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mulrow CD, Williams JW Jr, Gerety MB, et al. Case-finding instruments for depression in primary care settings. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:913–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Department of Psychiatry, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

Funded in full by a Michigan State All University Research Initiative Grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Banazak, D.A. Late-life depression in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 11, 163–167 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600269

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600269

Key words

Navigation