Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 213–218 | Cite as

Creation and assessment of a structured review course in physical diagnosis for medical residents

  • Salvatore Mangione
  • Steven J. Peitzman
  • Edward Gracely
  • Linda Z. Nieman
Original Articles

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of a course in physical diagnosis on the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of internal medicine trainees.

Design: A controlled, prospective assignment of housestaff to a yearlong curricular program, linked to a set of pre- and posttests. House-officers who could not attend the teaching sessions functioned as control subjects.

Setting: An internal medicine training program at an urban medical school.

Subjects: 56 (86.1%) of 65 eligible internal medicine housestaff (postgraduate years 1 through 3) participated in the intervention and assessment. A comparison group of 14 senior medical students participated in the pretest.

Intervention: 12 monthly lectures emphasizing skills useful in emergencies or validated by the literature.

Measurements: The pre- and posttests included: 1) a multiple-choice questionnaire to assess knowledge; 2) professional standardized patients to assess selected skills; and 3) Likert-type questionnaires to assess self-motivated learning and attitude toward diagnosis not based on technology.

Main results: The residents expressed interest in the program and on a six-point scale rated the usefulness of lectures and standardized patients as 3.5±1.3 and 4.3±1, respectively. For no system tested, however, did they achieve more than 55.2% correct answers (range: 24.2%–55.2%, median =41.04), and their performance did not differ from that of the fourth-year medical students. There was no significant difference in pre/posttest improvement between the control and intervention groups.

Conclusions: These data confirm the deficiencies of physical diagnostic skills and knowledge among physicians in training. These deficiencies were not corrected by the classroom lecture series. Improvement in these skills may require a more intense experiential program made part of residency requirements.

Key words

education residents physical examination diagnostic skills performance assessment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kern DC, Parrino TA, Korst DR. The lasting value of clinical skills. JAMA. 1985;254:70–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mandel JH, Rich EC, Luxenberg MG, Spillane MT, Kern DC, Parrino TA. Preparation for practice in internal medicine. A study of ten years of residency graduates. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:853–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Herbers JE Jr, Noel GL, Cooper GS, Harvey J, Pangaro LN, Weaver MJ. How accurate are faculty evaluations of clinical competence? J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:202–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Noel GL, Herbers JE Jr, Caplow MP, Cooper GS, Pangaro LN, Harvey J. How well do internal medicine faculty members evaluate the clinical skills of residents? Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:757–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Norcini JJ, Webster GD, Grosso LJ, Blank LL, Benson JA. Ratings of residents’ clinical competence and performance on certification examination. J Med Educ. 1987;62:457–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Collins GF, Cassie JM, Daggett CJ. The role of the attending physician in clinical training. J Med Educ. 1978;53:429–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wray NP, Friedland JA. Detection and correction of house staff error in physical diagnosis. JAMA. 1983;249:1035–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aloia JF, Jonas E. Skills in history-taking and physical examination. J Med Educ. 1976;51:410–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wiener S, Nathanson M. Physical examination. Frequently observed errors. JAMA. 1976;236:852–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mangione S, Nieman LZ, Gracely E, Kaye D. The teaching and practice of cardiac auscultation during internal medicine and cardiology training. A nationwide survey. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:47–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    St. Clair EW, Oddone EZ, Waugh RA, Corey GR, Feussner JR. Assessing housestaff diagnostic skills using a cardiology patient simulator. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:751–6.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hurst JW. Osier as visiting professor: house pupils plus six skills. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101:546–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peterson MC, Holbrook JH, Von Hales D, Smith NL, Staker LV. Contributions of the history, physical examination and laboratory investigation in making clinical diagnoses. West Med J. 1992;156:163–5.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sox HC, Morgan WL, Neufeld VR, Sheldon GF, Tonesk X. Subgroup report on clinical skills. J Med Educ. 1984;59(11 pt 2):139–47.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fitzgerald FT. The case for internal medicine. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:654–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© the Society of General Internal Medicine 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salvatore Mangione
    • 1
  • Steven J. Peitzman
  • Edward Gracely
  • Linda Z. Nieman
  1. 1.Department of Medicinethe Medical College of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations