Abstract
Objective: To assess the appropriateness of narcotic-prescribing practices in an ambulatory clinic for patients infected with HIV.
Design, setting, and patients: The medical records of 220 (190 HIV-positive) patients, seen in a clinic primarily designed for the long-term follow-up of ambulatory HIV-infected patients and located in an inner-city, public teaching hospital, were retrospectively reviewed to determine the prevalence and appropriateness of prescribing Drug Enforcement Administration schedule 2 narcotics. Appropriateness was based on published guidelines for the use of narcotics in the treatment of cancer patients.
Measurements and main results: The prevalence of narcotic use among the HIV-positive patients was 15%. Narcotics were prescribed for 38% of the patients who died, 33% of those with AIDS [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) clinical class C], 4% of those with AIDS-related complex (ARC) (CDC clinical class B), and 5% of asymp?tomatic HIV-positive patients (CDC clinical class A). None of the HIV-negative patients seen in the clinic received narcotics. Narcotics were more likely to be prescribed for patients with AIDS than for patients with ARC (p<0.001) or for HIV-positive patients (p<0.001). For the three CDC clinical classes, there was no significant difference among the proportions of patients receiving narcotics inappropriately (p=0.108). Among the risk groups, intravenous drug abusers were more likely to be prescribed narcotics inappropriately than were men who were homosexual (p<0.001) or individuals who were hetero?sexual (p=0.013); transfusion recipients were also more likely to be prescribed narcotics inappropriately than were homosexual men (p=0.026) or heterosexual men or women (p=0.032). Narcotics were more likely to be prescribed for patients with disseminated histoplasmosis (p=0.022),Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (p=0.001), candidal esophagitis (p=0.020), Kaposi’s sarcoma (p<0.001), or wasted appearance (p=0.043). Inappropriate prescrip?tions were more likely to be given to patients with dementia (p=0.005) or wasted appearance (p=0.019).
Conclusions: Physicians tend to prescribe narcotics inappropriately to patients known to have previously abused drugs and to those who appear wasted or have dementia. Physicians have a duty to prescribe narcotics appropriately as guided by recognized medical indications and the patients’ views concerning their current medical needs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bayer R. Gays and the stigma of bad blood. Hastings Cent Rep. 1983;Apr:5–7.
Atkinson JH, Grant I, Kennedy CJ. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among men infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45:859–64.
Hill CS. Narcotics and cancer pain control. CA Cancer J Clin. 1988;6:322–6.
Palte SB, Lancaster DJ, Miller ST, Morrison RE, Bobo L. The pattern of HIV infection in a southern state and city: a model for the outpatient clinic. J Tenn Med Assoc. 1990;83:339–43.
SAS Users Guide: Statistics Version, 5th ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc., 1985.
Miller RG Jr. Simultaneous Statistical Inference, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
Max MB, Schafer SC, Culnane M, et al. Amitriptyline but not lorazepam, relieves post-herpetic neuralgia. Neurology. 1988;38:427–32.
Bays HE, Pfeiffer MA. Peripheral diabetic neuropathy. Med Clin North Am. 1988;72:1459–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morrison, R.E., Brint, J.M., Smith, W.R. et al. Appropriate and inappropriate prescribing of narcotics for ambulatory HIV-positive patients. J Gen Intern Med 9, 301–305 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599175
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599175