Abstract
Objective:To describe internal medicine residents’ training and performance as well as patients’ attitudes and knowledge regarding the rectal examination.
Design:Descriptive survey of university-trained internal medicine residents and general medicine clinic patients.
Setting:General internal medicine residents’ longitudinal clinic at a university-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
Patients/participants:Ambulatory male veterans attending their general internal medicine clinic, all of whom were over the age of 40 years and had previously had a rectal examination (n=100), as well as all second- and third-year University of Minnesota internal medicine residents (n=78) were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire.
Measurements and main results:Residents differed in their training in, practice of, and understanding of indications for the rectal examination. Little formal instruction regarding patient comfort had been provided to residents, and many residents had never received supervised instruction in the rectal examination. Patients frequently were uncertain about why the examination had been performed, lacked understanding of the results of the examination, and often had preferences for examination comfort measures that differed from those utilized by their physicians.
Conclusions:Increased supervised instruction in the rectal examination in medical training programs is recommended. This should emphasize not only appropriate indications for this procedure but also attention to patient communication and comfort.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fitzgerald FT. Physical diagnosis versus modern technology—a review. West J Med. 1990;152:377–82.
Oboler SK, LaForce FM. The periodic physical examination in asymptomatic adults. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:214–26.
Engel GL. Are medical schools neglecting clinical skills? JAMA. 1976;236:861–3.
Bruhn JG. The doctor’s touch: tactile communication in the doctor-patient relationship. South Med J. 1978;71:1469–73.
Grantham P. The annual physical: what should we be doing? Can Med Assoc J. 1983;128:271–2.
Spitzer WO, Brown BP. Unanswered questions about the periodic health examination. Ann Intern Med. 1975;83:257–63.
Broadmore J, Carr-Gregg M, Hutton JD. Vaginal examinations: women’s experiences and preferences. N Z Med J. 1986;99:8–10.
Amias AG. Pelvic examination: a survey of British practice. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;94:975–8.
Billings JA, Stoeckle JD. Pelvic examination instruction and the doctor-patient relationship. J Med Educ. 1977;52:834–9.
Haar E, Halitsky V, Stricker G. Patients’ attitudes toward gynecologic examination and gynecologists. Med Care. 1977;787–95.
Magee J. The pelvic examination: a view from the other end of the table. Ann Intern Med. 1975;83:563–4.
Medical Practices Committee, American College of Physicians. Periodic health examination: a guide for designing individualized preventive health care in the asymptomatic patient. Ann Intern Med. 1981;95:729–32.
Weiner S, Nathanson M. Physical examination: frequently observed errors. JAMA. 1976;236:852–5.
Kern DC, Parrino TA, Korst DR. The lasting value of clinical skills. JAMA. 1985;254:70–6.
Mandel JH, Rich EC, Luxenberg MG, et al. Preparation for practice in internal medicine — a study of ten years of residency graduates. Arch Intern Med. 1988;148:853–6.
American Cancer Society. Report on the cancer-related health check-up. Cancer. 1980;30:194–240.
Report of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The periodic health examination: age-specific charts in the guide to clinical preventive services. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins, 1989;xxxi-xlviii.
Gnauck R, Macrae FA, Fleisher M. How to perform the fecal occult blood test. CA. 1984;34:134–7.
Lieberman DA. Colon cancer screening: the dilemma of positive screening tests. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:740–4.
DeGowin EL, DeGowin RL. The abdomen and rectosigmoid in bedside diagnostic examination. 5th ed. New York: MacMillan, 1987;536, 567–89.
Seidel HM, Ball JW, Dains JE, Benedict GW. Anus, rectum and prostate in Mosby’s guide to physical examination. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book, 1991;534–52.
Hennigan TW, Franks PJ, Hocken DB, Allen-Mersh TG. Rectal examination in general practice. Br Med J. 1990;301:478–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received from the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilt, T.J., Cutler, A.F. Physician performance and patient perceptions during the rectal examination. J Gen Intern Med 6, 514–517 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598219
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598219