Skip to main content
Log in

Do resident and staff physicians differ in the types and costs of antihypertensive drugs they select?

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective:To compare the types and costs of drugs prescribed by resident and staff physicians treating patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension.

Design:Cross-sectional study, using a computer-based medical record database.

Setting:Primary care internal medicine clinic in a large teaching hospital.

Patients/participants:Hypertensive patients seen by ten postgraduate year-1 (PGY-1) and PGY-2 primary care internal medicine residents and four staff physicians practicing in the same clinic.

Measurements and main results:The types and costs of antihypertensive drugs prescribed for the patients treated by resident and staff physicians were compared. A larger proportion of patients of resident physicians than of staff physicians were treated with calcium channel blockers [19(15%) vs. 40(4%), p<0.001]; residents prescribed thiazide diuretics less frequently and beta-blockers more frequently than did staff physicians, although these differences were not significant. The estimated average wholesale price of antihypertensive drugs for patients cared for by residents was 35% higher than that for patients cared for by staff physicians ($0.73 vs. $0.54, p=0.048). This difference was not fully explained by differences in practice composition.

Conclusions:Resident physicians in this study selected more expensive medications to treat hypertension than did their faculty preceptors, even when differences in practice composition were considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The 1988 report of the Joint National Committee on the Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 1988.

  2. Microx. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 1988;30(768):63–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnett GO. The application of computer-based medical-record systems in ambulatory practice. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:1643–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnett GO, Zielstorff RD, Piggins J, et al. COSTAR. A comprehensive medical information system for ambulatory care. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 1982;8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barnett GO, Justice NS, Somand ME, et al. COSTAR — a computer-based medical information system for ambulatory care. Proc IEEE. 1979;67:1226–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Webster S, Morgan M, Barnett GO. Medical Query Language: improved access to MUMPS databases. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington, DC: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 1987;306–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Drug Topics Red Book. Oradell, NJ: Medical Economics Co, Inc, 1988.

  8. Moser M. In defense of traditional antihypertensive therapy. Hypertension. 1988;12:324–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zusman RM. In defense of alternative antihypertensive therapy. Hypertension. 1988;12:327–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Edelson JT, Weinstein MC, Tosteson ANA, Williams L, Lee TH, Goldman L. Long-term cost — effectiveness of various initial monotherapies for mild to moderate hypertension. JAMA. 1990;263:407–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stason WB. Opportunities for improving the cost — effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment. Am J Med. 1986;81(suppl 6C):45–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shulman NB, Martinez B, Brogan D, Carr AA, Miles CG. Financial cost as an obstacle to hypertension therapy. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:1105–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Croog SH, Levine S, Testa MA, et al. The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1657–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hershey CO, Porter KD, Breslau D, et al. Influence of simple computerized feedback on prescribing charges in an ambulatory clinic. A randomized clinical trial. Med Care. 1986;24:472–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hershey CO, Goldberg HI, Cohen DI. The effect of computerized feedback coupled with a newsletter upon outpatient prescribing charges. Med Care. 1988;26:88–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moser M. Cost containment in the management of hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:107–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Laboratory of Computer Science and Primary Care Program of the General Internal Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Supported by postdoctoral training grant number T15-LM07037 from the National Library of Medicine (Dr. Payne) and by an educational grant from the Hewlett-Packard Corporation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Payne, T.H., Goodson, J.D., Morgan, M.M. et al. Do resident and staff physicians differ in the types and costs of antihypertensive drugs they select?. J Gen Intern Med 6, 439–444 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598167

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598167

Key words

Navigation