Skip to main content
Log in

Physicians’ and nurses’ perceptions of ethics problems on general medical services

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective:To understand the kinds of clinical situations physicians and nurses regard as “ethics problems.”

Design:The authors prospectively studied physicians’ and nurses’ perceptions of ethics problems using paired interviews. Individual interviews were conducted with physicians and nurses as they cared for the same patients during a six-week period. Each was asked whether any ethics problems had arisen in the care of his or her patients and, if so, to give a brief description of each problem.

Setting:Three general medical services in a 497-bed community teaching hospital.

Participants:13 physicians (mostly family medicine residents) and 42 nurses caring for 142 patients.

Main results:The physicians and nurses thought ethics problems were present in 75 of the 142 patient cases. Physicians and nurses identified ethics problems with similar frequencies; however, they often identified ethics problems in different patient cases or identified different ethics problems in the same case. Physicians and nurses described a variety of problem types. Physicians identified more problems related to quality of life, inappropriate hospital admissions, and cost of care; nurses identified more problems related to patient preferences, family wishes, pain management, implementing treatments, and discharge planning. A fourth of the ethics problems identified by physicians and nurses involved interstaff conflicts.

Conclusions:The physicians and nurses studied considered a broad range of clinical situations to be “ethics problems,” and they perceived them to occur frequently. Systematic differences were found between physicians’ and nurses’ perceptions of ethics problems, and many ethics problems generated interstaff conflicts. Incorporating this kind of information into clinical ethics education programs, and into hospital policies, may represent a useful approach toward improving physician—nurse interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miles SH, Lane LW, Bickel J, Walker RM, Cassel CK. Medical ethics education: coming of age. Acad Med. 1989;64:705–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lo B, Schroeder SA. Frequency of ethical dilemmas in a medical inpatient service. Arch Intern Med. 1981;141:1062–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis AJ. Ethical dilemmas: a survey. The Canadian Nurse. 1988;84:56–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gramelspacher GP, Howell JD, Young MJ. Perceptions of ethical problems by nurses and doctors. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146:577–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Prescott PA, Bowen SA. Physician—nurse relationships. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:127–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bosk CL. Forgive and remember: managing medical failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979. University of Chicago Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Siegler M. A legacy of Osler: teaching clinical ethics at the bedside. JAMA. 1978;239:951–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hastings Center. Guidelines on the termination of life-sustaining treatment and the care of the dying. Briarcliff manor, NY: Hastings Center, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Winkenwerder W. Ethical dilemmas for housestaff physicians: the care of critically ill and dying patients. JAMA. 1985;254:3454–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Black PM. Moral disagreements during residency training. JAMA. 1985;254:3467–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stein LI, Watts DT, Howell T. The doctor—nurse game revisited. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:546–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. American Nurses Association. The code for nurses with interpretive statements. Kansas City, MO American Nurses Association, 1976;1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pearlman RA, Jonsen A. The use of quality-of-life considerations in medical decision making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985;33:344–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pearlman RA, Uhlmann RF. Quality of life in chronic diseases: perceptions of elderly patients. J Gerontol. 1988;43:M25–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Starr TJ, Pearlman RA, Uhlmann RF. Quality of life and resuscitation decisions in elderly patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:373–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Eisenberg JM. Doctors’ decisions and the cost of medical care. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Health Administration Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Winslow G. Triage and justice: the ethics of rationing life saving medical resources. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Evans AL, Brody BA. The do-not-resuscitate order in teaching hospitals. JAMA. 1985;253:2236–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bedell SE, Delbanco TL. Choices about cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital: when do physicians talk with patients? N Engl J Med. 1984;310:1089–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Miles SH, Gomez CF. Protocols for elective use of life-sustaining treatments: a design guide. New York: Springer, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Makadon HJ, Gibbons MP. Nurses and physicians: prospects for collaboration. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:134–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ziegfeld C, Jones S. An innovative strategy to facilitate nurse—physician interaction. J Continuing Educ in Nurs. 1987;18:47–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The Center for Clinical Medical Ethics is supported by grants from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, The Pew Charitable Trusts, the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, and the Ira W. Decamp Foundation. Dr. Miles is a Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation Faculty Scholar in General Internal Medicine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, R.M., Miles, S.H., Stocking, C.B. et al. Physicians’ and nurses’ perceptions of ethics problems on general medical services. J Gen Intern Med 6, 424–429 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598164

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02598164

Key words

Navigation