Skip to main content
Log in

Preoperative medical consultations in a community hospital

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate the practice of consultations in the community hospital, chart reviews and consultant/surgeon interviews were conducted for 85 consecutive medical preoperative consultations for patients discharged from the Surgical Service. In 78 cases (92%) the authors agreed with the need or reason for the preoperative consultation; the majority were required for the management of chronic medical problems. Continuity of care was considered important by surgeons and consultants. Verbal communication was common, particularly from surgeon to consultant. Brief response time, specific recommendations, focused evaluations, and physician satisfaction with the existing system were the rule. However, 23 preoperative consultations (27%) were judged to be deficient. Compliance with recommendations was high (95%) but other measures of consultation effect were low.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mendenhall RC, Tarlov AR, Girard RA, et al. A national study of internal medicine and its subspecialties: II, Primary care in internal medicine. Ann Intern Med 1979;91:275–87

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rudd P, Siegler M, Byyny RL. Perioperative diabetic consultation: a plea for improved training. J Med Educ 1978;53:590–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. MacKenzie TB, Popkin NK, Callies AL, et al. The effectiveness of cardiology consultation. Chest 1981;79:16–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Klein LE, Moore RD, Levine DM, et al. Effectiveness of medical consultations. J Med Educ 1983;79:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  5. Horowitz RI, Henes CG, Horowitz SM. Developing strategies for improving the diagnostic and management efficacy of medical consultations. J Chronic Dis 1983;36:213–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McPhee SJ, Lo B, Saika GY, et al. How good is communication between primary care physicians and subspecialty consultants? Arch Intern Med 1984;144:1265–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee T, Pappius EM, Goldman L. Impact of interphysician communication on the effectiveness of medical consultations. Am J Med 1983;74:106–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Charlson ME, Cohen RP, Sears CL. General medicine consultation. Am J Med 1983;75:121–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldman L. Cardiac risks and complications of noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med 1983;98:504–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ziffren SE, Hartford CE. Comparative mortality for various surgical operations in older versus younger age groups. J Am Geriatr Soc 1972;20:485–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldman L, Lee T, Rudd P. Ten commandments for effective consultations. Arch Intern Med 1983;143:1753–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jencks SF, Dobson A. Strategies for reforming Medicare’s physician payments: physician diagnosis-related groups and other approaches. N Engl J Med 1985;312:1492–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lowenstein SR, Iezzoni LI, Moskowitz MA. Prospective payment for physician services. JAMA 1985;254:2632–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the University of Connecticut School of Medicine and Mount Sinai Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferguson, R.P., Rubinstien, E. Preoperative medical consultations in a community hospital. J Gen Intern Med 2, 89–92 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596302

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596302

Key words

Navigation