Skip to main content
Log in

Women’s and physicians’ utilities for health outcomes in estrogen replacement therapy

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) prevents fractures and relieves vasomotor symptoms, but it increases the risk of endometrial cancer. Previous studies and national prescribing patterns show that physicians are conservative in their approach to this therapy. The authors interviewed physicians and perimenopausal women to assess their utilities for the various health outcomes of estrogen replacement therapy. On all outcomes, physicians rated illness episodes followed by recovery as being closer to perfect health than did perimenopausal women. Physicians, in judging which outcomes were most important to women, estimated relief of symptoms above fracture prevention, whereas women rated fracture prevention above symptom relief. These results emphasize the need to assess patients’ utilities directly, particularly when utilities for the outcome of a particular therapy may influence the choice of a therapeutic regimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Osteoporosis. National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference Statements. JAMA volume 5, number 3

  2. Bush T, Cowan L, Barrett-Connor E et al. Estrogen use and all-cause mortality. JAMA 1983;249:903–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kennedy DL, Baum C, Forbes MB. Noncontraceptive estrogens and progestins: use patterns over time. Obstet Gynecol 1985;65:441–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Elstein AS, Holzman GB, Ravitch MM, et al. Comparison of physicians’ decisions regarding estrogen replacement therapy for menopausal women and decisions derived from a decision analytic model. Am J Med 1985;80:246–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cancer Statistics, 1986. CA 1986;36:9–25

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cummings SR, Kelsey JL, Nevitt MC, O’Dowd KJ. Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Epidemiol Rev 1985;7:178–207

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weinstein M, Schiff T. Cost-effectiveness of hormone replacement therapy in the menopause. Obstet Gynecol Survey 1983;38:445–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Holzman G, Ravitch M, Metheny W, Rothert M, Holmes M, Hoppe R. Physicians’ judgments about estrogen replacement therapy for menopausal women. Obstet Gynecol 1984;63:303–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Raffia H. Decision analysis: introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edwards W. How to use multi-attribute utility measurement for social decisions. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1977;(7):326–40

  11. Rovner DR, Holmes MM, Rothert ML, Elstein AS. States worse than death: premenopausal women and physicians preferences for death and disability. Med Decis Making 1985;4:541

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leighton-Reid J, Quinn RJ, Berwick DM, Fineberg HV, Weinstein MC. Preferences for health outcomes comparison of assessment methods. Med Decis Making 1984;4:315–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eraker SA, Sox HC. Assessment of patient’s preferences for therapeutic outcomes. Med Decis Making 1981;1:29–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Weinstein MC, Feinberg HV, Elstein AS, et al. Clinical decision analysis. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders. 1980

    Google Scholar 

  15. McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med 1982;306:1259–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by a grant from the National Fund for Medical Education, #47/81.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holmes, M.M., Rovner, D.R., Rothert, M.L. et al. Women’s and physicians’ utilities for health outcomes in estrogen replacement therapy. J Gen Intern Med 2, 178–182 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596148

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596148

Key words

Navigation