Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvic floor and urethra: body coil versus endovaginal coil

  • Papers
  • Published:
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The anatomy of the female pelvic floor and urethra is complex. With the introduction of MRI, the discussion about the normal anatomy of this area has not diminished. The use of a body coil may be contributary to this. In the present study images obtained with an endovaginal coil are compared with those of a quadrature body coil series to study the possible advantages of endovaginal imaging. Axial and radial T2-w TSE images at a 1.0-T machine were obtained in seven healthy volunteers. The pelvic floor structures as well as the levator ani muscle and the urogenital diaphragm are excellently demonstrated with the endovaginal coil. Also, the urethrovaginal sphincter could be recognized in six volunteers, but only in three with the body coil. In six volunteers a new ligamentous structure, the urethropelvic sling, connecting the urethra to the levator ani muscle and contributing to the supporting mechanism of the urethra is shown with the endovaginal coil. The zonal anatomy of the urethra is excellently shown with the endovaginal coil. The urethral length could only be accurately measured with this coil and ranged from 3.1 to 3.6 cm. Compared with the body coil, endovaginal MRI is excellent in demonstrating the anatomy of the pelvic floor and urethra.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hricak H (1991) Female urethra: MR imaging.Radiology 178: 527–535.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gosling JA (1985) The structure of the female lower urinary tract and pelvic floor.Urol Clin North Am 12: 207–214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Klutke CG (1995) Functional female pelvic anatomy.Urol Clin North Am 22: 487–498.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mostwin JL (1991) Current concepts of female pelvic anatomy and physiology.Urol Clin North Am 18: 175–195.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. DeLancey JOL (1986) Correlative study of paraurethral anatomy.Obstet Gynecol 68: 91–97.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klutke C (1990) The anatomy of stress incontinence: magnetic resonance imaging of the female bladder neck and urethra.J Urol 143: 563–566.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hussain SM (1995) Anal sphincter complex: endoanal MR imaging of normal anatomy.Radiology 197: 671–677.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stoker J (1996) Technical note: endoanal coil in MR imaging of anal fistulas.AJR 166: 360–362.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tan, I.L., Stoker, J. & Laméris, J.S. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvic floor and urethra: body coil versus endovaginal coil. MAGMA 5, 59–63 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02592267

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02592267

Keywords

Navigation