Skip to main content
Log in

Dating and relationship issues

  • Published:
Sexuality and Disability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

The subject of dating and relationships for women with disabilities is one of those areas for which we have many more questions than answers, more suggested tendencies than demonstrated patterns of variables. If research pursuits reflect social values, it makes sense that a society that has long ignored or disdained the gender role of women with disabilities has invested little effort in understanding their potential for love, partnership and motherhood.

Faced with an intolerable information void, women with disabilities have been increasingly forthright in reporting our relationship experiences our goals, our joy, and our solitariness. The generosity of those who tell their stories has helped all of us women with disabilities to become more visible as women. There remain, however, too many unknowns. Women with disabilities want facts to guide our efforts—efforts cautiously and thriftily expended by necessity. More than ever, we feel entitled to better research studies that address our dreams.

Some of our most urgently asked questions concern relationships. What makes a woman with a disability attractive to a partner? How do you navigate the obstacles from attraction to commitment? How have some women with disabilities managed to be more successful than others in relationships? What are the relationship experiences of lesbians with disabilities? What factors determine the viability of “mixed” partnerships involving individuals with and without disabilities, and how do such persons surmount the obstacles of prejudice and frustration? What factors lead to and enhance intimacy between partners with disabilities? These are the questions of women with a growing sense of entitlement to being heard and to being adequately understood. Women with disabilities are becoming as determined to find answers as we have always been determined to find love.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Americans with Disabilities Act. PL 101-336

  • Bowe, F. (1984).Disabled women in America. Washington, D.C.: President's Committee on Employment of the Handicapped.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, Y. (1981). …All things are possible. Ann Arbor, MI: A.J. Garvin Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M., & Asch, A. (Eds.) (1988). Introduction: Beyond pedestals.Women with disabilities: Essays in psychology, culture, and politics (pp. 1–37). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna W.J., & Rogovsky, B. (1986). Women and disability: Stigma and “the third factor.” Unpublished paper, Department of Family and Community Development. University of Maryland, College Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannaford, S. (1985).Living outside inside. Berkeley, CA: Canterbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B.S. (1992). We are who you are: Feminism and disability.Ms., 3, 70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G.F. (1983).Voices from the shadows: Women with disabilities speak out. Toronto: Women's Educational Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelka, F. (1993). Rape.Mainstream, 18, 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1977, February 4). Discrimination against disable women.International Rehabilitation Review.

  • Sobsey, D. (1994).Violence and abuse in the lives of people with disabilities: The end of silent acceptance? Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stovall, C., & Sedlacek, W.E. (1983). Attitudes of male and female university students toward students with different physical disabilities.Journal of College Student Personal, 24, 325–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M., D'Amico, R., Marder, C., Newman L., & Blackorby, J. (1992). What happens next? Trends in postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. The second comprehensive report from the national longitudinal transition study of special education studiets. Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gill, C.J. Dating and relationship issues. Sex Disabil 14, 183–190 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02590076

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02590076

Key Words

Navigation