Conclusions
The subject of dating and relationships for women with disabilities is one of those areas for which we have many more questions than answers, more suggested tendencies than demonstrated patterns of variables. If research pursuits reflect social values, it makes sense that a society that has long ignored or disdained the gender role of women with disabilities has invested little effort in understanding their potential for love, partnership and motherhood.
Faced with an intolerable information void, women with disabilities have been increasingly forthright in reporting our relationship experiences our goals, our joy, and our solitariness. The generosity of those who tell their stories has helped all of us women with disabilities to become more visible as women. There remain, however, too many unknowns. Women with disabilities want facts to guide our efforts—efforts cautiously and thriftily expended by necessity. More than ever, we feel entitled to better research studies that address our dreams.
Some of our most urgently asked questions concern relationships. What makes a woman with a disability attractive to a partner? How do you navigate the obstacles from attraction to commitment? How have some women with disabilities managed to be more successful than others in relationships? What are the relationship experiences of lesbians with disabilities? What factors determine the viability of “mixed” partnerships involving individuals with and without disabilities, and how do such persons surmount the obstacles of prejudice and frustration? What factors lead to and enhance intimacy between partners with disabilities? These are the questions of women with a growing sense of entitlement to being heard and to being adequately understood. Women with disabilities are becoming as determined to find answers as we have always been determined to find love.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Americans with Disabilities Act. PL 101-336
Bowe, F. (1984).Disabled women in America. Washington, D.C.: President's Committee on Employment of the Handicapped.
Duffy, Y. (1981). …All things are possible. Ann Arbor, MI: A.J. Garvin Associates.
Fine, M., & Asch, A. (Eds.) (1988). Introduction: Beyond pedestals.Women with disabilities: Essays in psychology, culture, and politics (pp. 1–37). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Hanna W.J., & Rogovsky, B. (1986). Women and disability: Stigma and “the third factor.” Unpublished paper, Department of Family and Community Development. University of Maryland, College Park.
Hannaford, S. (1985).Living outside inside. Berkeley, CA: Canterbury Press.
Klein, B.S. (1992). We are who you are: Feminism and disability.Ms., 3, 70–74.
Matthews, G.F. (1983).Voices from the shadows: Women with disabilities speak out. Toronto: Women's Educational Press.
Pelka, F. (1993). Rape.Mainstream, 18, 24–33.
Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1977, February 4). Discrimination against disable women.International Rehabilitation Review.
Sobsey, D. (1994).Violence and abuse in the lives of people with disabilities: The end of silent acceptance? Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Stovall, C., & Sedlacek, W.E. (1983). Attitudes of male and female university students toward students with different physical disabilities.Journal of College Student Personal, 24, 325–330.
Wagner, M., D'Amico, R., Marder, C., Newman L., & Blackorby, J. (1992). What happens next? Trends in postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. The second comprehensive report from the national longitudinal transition study of special education studiets. Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gill, C.J. Dating and relationship issues. Sex Disabil 14, 183–190 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02590076
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02590076