Skip to main content
Log in

Ground flora trampling studies: Five years after closure

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trampling as an ecological factor is a major concern of the management of park, forest, nature preserves, and wilderness areas as recreational resources. Of particular importance to the management concept of carrying capacity is the relative resistance of native plant communities, to trampling and the resilience or the capacity of impacted communities to recover. This information can be used by management to establish seasonal use limits to prevent irreversible degradation of these resources. The purpose of this study was to follow the recolonizaton of experimental trail surfaces barren of vegetative cover and hiked at three levels of use intensity. Results of this study indicate that soil compaction as measured by soil penetration resistance increased progressively with use level while the total number of species, species diversity, and dominant index scores declined. A major finding was that the greatest degree of change occurred at the first level of hiking, indicating that major floristic measures were most affected by the least amount of hiking. Recolonization of impacted areas that received 100 trampling passes as measured by plant cover, dominant indices, floristic dissimilarity, and species diversity was similar to areas receiving four and eight times more trampling, despite major differences in soil penetration resistance. These data suggest limited use delivered at one time can be as damaging as increasing levels of use delivered at over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Bell, K., and L. C. Bliss. 1973. Alpine disturbance studies: Olympic National Park, U.S.A.Biological Conservation 5: 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burden, R. F., and P. F. Randerson. 1972. Quantitative studies of the effects of human trampling on vegetation as an aid to the management of semi- natural areas.Journal of Applied Ecology 9:439–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. E., and G. W. Scotter. 1975. Subalpine revegetation and disturbance studies. Mount Revelstoke National Park. Unpublished report. Canadian Wildlife Service, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 99 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N.. 1978. Estimating the susceptibility of wildland vegetation to trailside vegetation.Journal of Applied Ecology 15:281–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. N. 1985. Recreational trampling effects on six habitat types in western Montana. USDA Forest Service, Research Paper INT-350, Ogden, Utah. 43 pp.

  • Cole, D. N. 1979. Reducing the impact of hikers on vegetation: An application of analytical research. Papges 71–78in Proceedings, Recreation Impact on Wildlands Conference, Seattle, Washington, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region.

  • Cole, D. N., and E. G. Schreiner. 1981. Impacts of backcountry recreation: Site management and rehabilitation—an annotated bibliography. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-121. Ogden, Utah. 53 pp.

  • del Moral, R. 1979. Predicting human impact on high elevation ecosystems. Pages 292–303in Proceedings, Recreational Impact on Wildlands Conference, Seattle, Washington, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region.

  • Dissmeyer, G. E., and G. R. Foster. 1980. A guide for predicting sheet and rill erosion on forest land. USDA Forest Service Technical Publication SA-TP11. Atlanta, Georgia. 40 pp.

  • Hall C. N.. 1989. Using impact indices and baseline vegetation data to assess the condition of a wilderness. A case study of the Dolly Sods Wilderness, Mononghala National Forest, West Virginia. PhD dissertation. Univesity of Maryland, College Park, Maryland. 320 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. N., and F. R. Kuss. 1989. Vegetation alteration along trails in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia.Biological Conservation 48: 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, D. O., and H. E. M. Dobson. 1976. Ecological carrying capacity research: Yosemite National Park; Part I: The effects of human trampling and urine on subalpine vegetation—a survey of past and present backcountry use and the ecological carrying capacity of wilderness. US Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, No. PB270-955. 147 pp.

  • Hudson, M.. 1977. Fortymile River: Biological aspects of carrying capacity. Unpublished report. USDI Bureau of Land Management, Tok, Alaska. 52 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuss, F. R.. 1983. Hiking boot impacts on woodland trails.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 38: 119–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuss, F. R., and J. M. Morgan, III. 1984. Using the USLE to estimate the physical carrying capacity of natural areas for outdoor recreation planning.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 39:383–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuss, F. R., A. R. Graefe, and J. J. Vaske. 1987. Recreation impacts and carrying capacity: A review and synthesis of ecological and social research. National Parks and Conservation Association, Washington, DC. 249 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemons, J.. 1979. Coefficient of community and carrying capacity for a sub-alpine meadow. Pages 33–60in Proceedings, Second Conference on Scientific Research in the National Parks. San Francisco, California, USDI National Park Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, R. E., P. W. Conklin, and J. L. McMahon. 1984. Recovery of a bryophyte community on Hurricane Island, Maine. USDA Forest Service Research Note NE-325 Broomall, Pennsylvania. 4 pp.

  • Leonard, R. E., J. L. McMahon, and K. M. Kehoe. 1985a. Hiker trampling impacts on eastern forests. USDA Research Paper NE-555. Broomall, Pennsylvania. 5 pp.

  • Leonard, R. E., P. W. Conklin and J. L. McMahon. 1985b. The response of plant species to low-level trampling stress on Hurricance Island, ME. USDA Forest Service Research Note NE-327. Broomall, Pennsylvania. 6pp.

  • Liddle, M. J.. 1975. A selective review of the ecological effects of human trampling on natural ecosystems.Biological Conservation. 7:17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. J., and J. W. Holmes. 1979. Soil physics. Cambridge University Press, London. 345 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshand, P. J.. 1980. High elevation revegetation in eastern United States: State-of-the-art and problem analysis. Un published Report, NE23-156. USDA Forest Service, Broomhall, Pennsylvania. 33 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. M., III, and F. R. Kuss. 1986. Soil loss as a measure of carrying capacity in recreation environments.Environmental Management 10:263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. P. C. 1983. The impact of recreation on mountain soils: Toward a predictive model for soil erosion. Pages 112–121in N. G. Bayfield and G. C. Barrow (eds.), The ecological impacts of outdoor recreation on mountain areas in Europe and North Arnerica Recreation Ecology Research Group Report #9, R.E.R.G. Meeting Brathay Hall, Ambleside, Cumbria, Sept 9–12, 203 pp.

  • Parsons, D. J.. 1979. The recovery of Bullfrog Lake.Fremontia 7:9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, M. F.. 1983. Management planning in the sunshine area of Canada's Banff National park.Parks 7:6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, W. H.. 1979. Vegetative structure, physical environment and disturbance in White Sands National Monument, New Mexico. Pages 71–85in Proceedings of the Second Conference on Scientific Research in the National Parks. San Francisco, California. USDI National Park Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scotter, G. W.. 1976. Recovery of subalpine meadows under protection after damage by human activity: Yoho National Park. Unpublished report., Canadian Wildlife Service, Edmonton, Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E., and W. Wiener., 1963. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siccama, T. G., F. H. Bormann and G. F. Likens. 1970. The Hubbard Brook Study: Productivity, nutrients and phytosociology of the herbaceous layer.Ecological Monographs 40:389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speight, M. C. D.. 1973. Outdoor recreation and its ecological effects: A bibliography and review. Discussion papers in conservation. 4. University College, London. 35 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren, T. J. 1982. Vegetation and soil recovery of subalpine campsites in Sequoia National Park, California. Master's thesis. California State University, Fresno. 49 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H. M., and E. Burnett. 1963. Influence of soil strength on root-growth habits of plants.Soil Science 98: 174–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorud, D. B., and S. S. Frissell, Jr.. 1976. Time changes in soil density following compaction under an oak forest.Minnesota Forest Research Note 257: 4 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Soil Conservation Service. 1972. Soil survey of Somerset County, southern part. Orono., Mexico.

  • Willard, B., and J. Marr. 1971. Recovery of alpine tundra under protection after damage by human activity in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado.Biological Conservation 3:131–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuss, F.R., Hall, C.N. Ground flora trampling studies: Five years after closure. Environmental Management 15, 715–727 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02589629

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02589629

Key words

Navigation