Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Epikondylitissyndrom

Epicondylitis humeriradialis — Denervation and desinsertion according to Wilhelm

  • Originalarbeiten
  • Published:
Unfallchirurgie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Nach Darstellung der Problematik des Krankheitsbildes und der verschiedenen Therapiemöglichkeiten wird auf das operative vorgehen nach Wilhelm und Gieseler näher eingegangen und die Nachuntersuchungsergebnisse von 40 eigenen Fällen mitgeteilt.

Abstract

The opinions concerning the etiology and pathogenesis of the epicondylitis humeri radialis are not unanimous. According to Hoffmann the damage arises in the area, where the extensor muscles are originating, causing there an irritation to the periost. Reischauer emphasizes the vertebral origin of the condition. According to his theory the epicondylitis is the result of an irritation of the cervical spine. Other authors conclude, that there are only local changes in the soft tissues around the joint, which produce an epicondylitis. Besides conservative measures such as plaster for immobilisation, local injections of corticosteroids, physiotherapy etc., the treatment of choice is a surgical intervention. The operation according to Hohmann yields good results in 65% of all cases. We prefer the surgical denervation and desinsertion according to Wilhelm and Gieseler in those cases, which are resistant to other therapy. A follow-up of our 40 patients, who were treated according to this method, revealed good results in 90% of all cases and confirmed previous reports in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Bosworth, D. M.: Role of articular ligament in Tenniselbow. J. Bone Jt Surg. A 37 (1955), 527.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garden, R. S.: Tenniselbow. J. Bone Jt. Surg. B. 43 (1961), 100.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Graff, U.: Die Epicondylitis humeri — Krankheit oder Symptom. Chir. Praxis 18 (1974), 285.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Griesmann, H.: Die Epicondylitis humeri lateralis. Chirurg 22 (1951), 43.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hohmann, G.: Das Wesen und die Behandlung des sogenannten Tennisellenbogens. Münch. Wschr. 80 (1933), 250.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplan, B.: Treatment of Tenniselbow (Epicondylitis) by Denervation. J. Bone Jt Surg. A 37 (1955), 527.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kopel, H. P., W. A. L. Thompson: Peripheral Entrapment Neuropathies. Baltimore 1963.

  8. Lange, M.: Orthopädisch-Chirurgische Operationslehre, 2. Auflage. Bergmann, München 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lanz, T. v., W. Wachsmuth: Praktische Anatomie, Bd. I/3. Springer, Berlin 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mau, C.: Die Behandlung der Epicondylitis humeri. Chirurg. 3 (1931), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reischauer, F.: Epicondylitis und Tendinitis der Arme, eine Krankheit durch Überbeanspruchung? Mschr. Unfallheilkd. 60 (1957), 321.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schneider, H., Z. Corradini: Aufbrauchveränderungen in sehr beanspruchten Sehnen der oberen Extremität und ihre klinische Bedeutung. Orthopäde 84 (1954), 278.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tönnis, D.: Die Epicondylitis humeri. Act. Chir. 11 (1976), 163.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weil, S.: Handbuch der Orthopädie, Bd. III. Georg Thieme, Stuttgart 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilhelm, A., H. Grieseler: Die Behandlung der Epicondylitis humeri radialis durch Denervation. Chirurg 33 (1962), 118.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleining, R., Ludolph, E. Epikondylitissyndrom. Unfallchirurgie 5, 5–9 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02589312

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02589312

Navigation