Skip to main content
Log in

Does neostigmine cause disruption of large-intestinal anastomoses?

A negative answer

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Summary

Recent evidence has suggested that intraoperative administration of neostigmine to reverse the effects ofd-tubocurarine has contributed to anastomotic disruption or leakage of large-intestinal anastomoses. A retrospective study of 187 consecutive cases of large-intestinal anastomoses was made at the Ochsner Foundation Hospital. Thirtyeight patients received 2.5 mg of neostigmine and 1.2 mg of atropine sulfate by intravenous injection to reverse the effects ofd-tubocurarine. Of the 149 patients who received no such reversing drugs, there was clinical evidence of anastomotic leakage in three. None of the 38 patients who received neostigmine showed clinical evidence of anastomotic leak or disruption. On this basis, we see no reason to discontinue reversal of the effect ofd-tubocurarine with neostigmine and atropine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aylett SO: Three hundred cases of diffuse ulcerative colitis treated by total colectomy and ileo-rectal anastomosis. Br Med J 1:1001, 1966

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell CM, Lewis CB: Effects of neostigmine on integrity of ileorectal anastomoses. Br Med J 3:587, 1968

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaudhary NA, Truelove SC: Human colonic motility: A comparative study of normal subjects, patients with ulcerative colitis, and patients with the irritable colon syndrome. II. The effect of prostigmin. Gastroenterology 40:18, 1961

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Doughty AG, Wylie WD: Antidotes to “true” curarizing agents including a report on Ro2-3198 (Tensilon). Br J Anaesth 24:66, 1952

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dripps RD, Eckenhoff JE, Vandam LD: Introduction to Anesthesia: The Principles of Safe Practice. Ed. 3. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1967, 529 pp

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goligher JC, Graham NG, De Dombal FT: Anastomotic dehiscence after anterior resection of rectum and sigmoid. Br J Surg 57: 109, 1970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodman LS, Gilman A: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics: A Textbook of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Therapeutics for Physicians and Medical Students. Ed. 4. New York, Macmillan, 1970, 1794 pp

    Google Scholar 

  8. Griffith HR, Johnson GE: The use of curare in general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 3:418, 1942

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Painter NS: The aetiology of diverticulosis of the colon with special reference to the action of certain drugs on the behaviour of the colon. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 34:98, 1964

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Painter NS: The effect of neostigmine methyl sulphate on the human colon in health and in diverticulosis. Proc R Soc Med 60:219, 1967

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Painter NS, Truelove SC: The intraluminal pressure patterns in diverticulosis of the colon. Part III. The effect of prostigmine. Gut 5:365, 1964

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Cofer, T.W., Ray, J.E. & Gathright, J.B. Does neostigmine cause disruption of large-intestinal anastomoses?. Dis Colon Rectum 17, 235–237 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02588107

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02588107

Keywords

Navigation