Skip to main content
Log in

Survey of hemorrhoidectomy practices: Open versus closed techniques

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Summary

A questionnaire was sent to members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Four hundred and forty-five (43.6%) were tabulated to establish criteria and results of surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. The most frequent indication for surgery, was internal and external hemorrhoids with mucosal prolapse. Significant differences were found in time required for complete healing, frequency of wound dehiscence, frequency of postoperative stenosis, and frequency of postoperative infection. Results did not support opinions that the closed technique was associated with significantly less pain, fewer complications, shorter hospital stay or earlier resumption of work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Atlanta, Georgia June 10 to 14, 1979.

About this article

Cite this article

Wolf, J.S., Munoz, J.J. & Rosin, J.D. Survey of hemorrhoidectomy practices: Open versus closed techniques. Dis Colon Rectum 22, 536–538 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02586999

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02586999

Keywords

Navigation