Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The significance of a “positive” rectal examination in acute appendicitis

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

“The examining physician often hesitates to make the necessary examination because it involves soiling the finger.”—W.J. Mayo, 1915

Summary

The results of rectal examinations of 495 patients with suspected acute appendicitis were correlated with six other variables from the patients' histories and results of physical examinations. Positive rectal examination results were recorded for 46 per cent of all patients with acute appendicitis and for 53 per cent of those with normal appendices. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis should not be based solely or primarily on the results of the rectal examination. The examination should, however, be performed in all suspected cases of appendicitis to rule out gynecologic and urologic disease. “If you don't put your finger in, you put your foot in it.” - H. Bailey, 19732

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackerman NB: The continuing problems of perforated appendicitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 139: 29, 1974

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bailey H: Demonstrations of Physical Signs in Clinical Surgery. Ed 15, Baltimore, The Williams and Wilkins Company, 1973, p 275

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boyce FF: Acute Appendicitis and its Complications. New York, Oxford University Press, 1949, 487 pp

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gladstone RJ, Wakeley CP: The relative frequency of the various positions of the vermiform appendix: As ascertained by an analysis of 3,000 cases: With an account of its development. Br J Surg 11: 503, 1924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hudson HW Jr, Chamberlain JW: Acute appendicitis in childhood: A statistical study of 848 cases from the Children's Hospital, Boston. J Pediatr 15: 408, 1939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kazarian KK, Roeder WF, Mersheimer WL: Decreasing mortality and increasing morbidity from acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 119: 681, 1970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lewis FR, Holcroft JW, Boey J, et al: Appendicitis: A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases. Arch Surg 110: 677, 1975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Magee RB, Stowell JM, MacDuffee RC: Appendicitis: An analysis of 2,117 cases treated surgically in a community hospital during a period of twenty years. Pa Med 70: 47, 1967

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayo WJ: The cancer problem. J-Lancet 35: 339, 1915

    Google Scholar 

  10. Osler W: The Principles and Practices of Medicine Designed for the Use of Practitioners and Students of Medicine. Ed 4, New York, D Appleton and Company, 1901, p 525

    Google Scholar 

  11. Owens BJ, Hamit HF: Appendicitis in the elderly. Ann Surg 187: 392, 1978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith PH: The diagnosis of appendicitis. Postgrad Med J 41: 2, 1965

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Diego, California, June 11 to 15, 1978.

About this article

Cite this article

Bonello, J.C., Abrams, J.S. The significance of a “positive” rectal examination in acute appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 22, 97–101 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02586770

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02586770

Keywords

Navigation