Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical aspects of the university-industry interface

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following an examination of the missions of industry and the university there is a comparison of the ‘wish-lists’ of industry and the university. These ‘wish-lists’ have both similarities and differences. Some of the differences are expressed in a further section on the kinds of interactions that neither institution wants from the other. In the canonical university, the culture values features such as openness, individuality and the de-emphasis of monetary matters, whereas in the archetypal industry the prevailing ethos tends towards secrecy, teamwork and financial advancement. When two such cultures are juxtaposed under conditions where the survival of the university is dependent, in part, on receiving funds from industry, there is a danger of an erosion of academic standards as the university becomes more oriented to service the needs of industry as opposed to the development of its students and its independent scholastic and research activities. Industry, however, is in a position to derive benefit from the interaction without incurring an equivalent cost. These issues are discussed and some recommendations are made to improve the ethical nature of the interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maddox J. (1994) Academics in business mix poorly,Nature 371, 555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Policy and Strategy for Higher Education: Collaboration between Business and Higher Education (1989), The Department of Trade and Industry and the Council for Industry and Higher Education. HMSO, London, p 8–9.

  3. Editorial (1994) The Dangers of the University Business,Nature 372, 579–580.

  4. Giamatti A.B. (1982) The University, Industry, and Cooperative Research,Science 218, 1278–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guidelines for Directors. (1990) Institute of Directors, London, U.K., pp 11–12.

  6. Industrial Perspectives on Innovation and Interactions with Universities: Summary of Interviews with Senior Industrial Officials (1991), National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

  7. Restructuring Academic Science: A New Framework for UK Policy (1989), John Ziman, Director, Science Policy Support Group. SPSG Concept Paper No.8. 22 Henrietta St., London WC2E 8NA. (2.5.4: 3.6.1).

  8. Information for Table 1 abstracted from G. Messadié (1991)Great Modern Inventions, Chambers, Edinburgh.

  9. Coleman R. (Government Chief Chemist), (1983) Conference Speech at ‘Biotech ’83’, OnLine, Wembly, London.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abelson P.H., (1994) Editorial: Evolution of Industrial Research,Science 265, 299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Forward Look of Government-funded Science, Engineering and Technology, Statistical Supplement (1994). HMSO, London, Table 1.5.1.

  12. Powell D., (1994), Report Condemns Pressure to Publish,Science 264, 1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abbott A. (1994) Germany debates future research centres.Nature 372, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. US Science OK. (Quoting ISI), (1991),Nature 350, 6.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spier, R. Ethical aspects of the university-industry interface. Sci Eng Ethics 1, 151–162 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02584071

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02584071

Keywords

Navigation