This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Footnotes
Panel on the Arts, Education, and America.Coming to Our Senses: The Significance of the Arts for American Education New York: McGraw, 1977.
Brustein, Robert. “Whither the National Arts and Humanities Endowments?”,The New York Times. December 18, 1977, p. 35D.
“National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities Act of 1965.” (Public Law 209-89th Congress), Sec. 2 (2), p. 1.
The Foundation Directory, 6h Ed., ed. Marianna O. Lewis, New York: Columbia University Press, 1977, p. 323.
National Endowment for the Arts and Humanities Annual Report 1977. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977.
Langer, Suzanne.Problems of Art. New York: Scribners, 1957, p. 72.
Schonberg, Harold L. “Elitism, in the Arts, Is Good,”The New York Times, Feb. 5, 1978, p. 19D.
Strong support for aesthetic education and numerous recommendations for accomplishing this have come from the Panel on the Arts, Education, and Americans, which recently published a comprehensive and resourceful study, See footnote 1.
Munson, Henry Lee. “Subsidy of the Arts in Free Europe and the United States,”Music Journal, January 1964, p. 46.
Walker, John A. “APG: The Individual and the Organization; A Decade of Conceptual Engineering,”Studio International, March/April, 1976, pp. 162–165.
Statement by the President on the proposed National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities, March 10, 1965 (9, p. 273).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berleant, A. Subsidization of art as social policy. J Cult Econ 4, 63–72 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02580850
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02580850