Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On a compromise social choice correspondence

  • Published:
Top Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the compromise social choice correspondence derived from the τ-value of digraph games. Monotonicity of this correspondence is shown. A connection between several properties of social choice correspondences based on game theoretical solutions and game theoretical properties of the underlying solutions is given. Applications to several game theoretic solutions are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banzhaf J.F. (1965). Weighted voting doesn’t work: A mathematical analysis.Rutgers Law Review 19, 317–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borm P., Brink R. van den, Levínsky R. and M. Slikker (2000). On two new social choice correspondences. CentER DP 2000-125, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands. To appear in Mathematical Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink R. van den and Borm P. (1994). Digraph competitions and cooperative games. CentER DP 9424, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands. To appear in Theory and Decision.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn P.C. (1977). Condorcet social choice functions.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 33, 464–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laslier J.F. (1997).Tournament Solutions and Majority Voting. Springer-Verlag.

  • Quant M., Borm P., Reijnierse H. and Voorneveld M. (2002). Characterizations of solutions in digraph competitions. CentER DP 2002-113, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley L.S. (1953). A value for n-person games.Annals of Mathematics Studies 28, 307–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tijs S.H. (1981). Bounds for the core and the τ-value. In: Moeschlin O. and Pallaschke D. (eds.),Game Theory and Mathematical Economics. North-Holland, 123–132.

  • Tijs S.H. (1987). An axiomatization of the τ-value.Mathematical Social Sciences 13, 177–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Econometrics and OR and CentER, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands

    Marieke Quant, Peter Borm & Hans Reijnierse

  2. Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, P.O. Box 6501, SE-113 83, Stockholm, Sweden

    Mark Voorneveld

Authors
  1. Marieke Quant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Borm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hans Reijnierse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mark Voorneveld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quant, M., Borm, P., Reijnierse, H. et al. On a compromise social choice correspondence. Top 11, 311–324 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02579047

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02579047

Key Words

AMS subject classification

Search

Navigation