Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The new contrast agents: A perspective

  • Editorial
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bettmann MA, Gordon J (1985) Effects of contrast agents on endothelial cell function (abstract). Radiology 157:211

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bourdillon PD, Bettmann MA, McCracken S, Poole-Wilson PA, Grossman W (1985) Effects of a new nonionic and a conventional ionic contrast agent on coronary sinus ionized calcium and left ventricular hemodynamics in dogs. J Am Coll Cardiol 6:845–853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Higgins CB, Sovak M, Schmidt WS, Kelley MJ, Newell JD (1980) Direct myocardial effects of intracoronary administration on new contrast materials with low osmolality. Invest Radiol 15:39–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wisneski JA, Gertz EW, Neexe RA, Morris DL (1985) Absence of myocardial biochemical toxicity with a nonionic contrast agent, lopamidol. Am Heart J 110:609–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sovak M, Ranganathan R, Johnson M (1980) Spectral analysis of lupine EEG: Neurotoxicologic evaluation of new nonionic contrast media. Invest Radiol 15:452–456

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Almen T (1983) Experimental investigations with Iohexol. Acta Radiologica (Suppl) 366:9–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bettmann MA, Higgins CB (1985) Comparison of an ionic with a nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography: Results of a multicenter trial. Invest Radiol 20:S70-S74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Salem DN, Konstam MA, Isner JM, Bonin JD (1986) Comparison of the electrocardiographic and hemodynamic responses to ionic and nonionic radiocontrast media during left ventriculography: A randomized double-blind study. Am Heart J 111:533–536

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rapaport S, Bookstein JJ, Higgins CB, Corey PH, Sovak M, Lasser EC (1982) Experience with Metrizamide in patients with previous severe anaphylactoid reactions to ionic contrast agents. Radiology 143:321–325

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holtås S (1984) Iohexol in patients with previous adverse reactions to contrast media. Invest Radiol 19:563–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bettmann MA, Finkelstein J, Geller S (1984) The use of Iopamidol, a new nonionic contrast agent, in lower limb phlebography. Invest Radiol 19:S225-S228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kieffer SA, Binet EF, Davis DO, Gabrielsen TO, Kido DK, Latchaw RE, Turski PA, Shaw DA (1984) Lumbar myelography with lohexol and Metrizamide: A comparative multicenter prospective study. Radiology 151:665–670

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lamb JT (1985) Iohexol vs. Iopamidol for myelography. Invest Radiol 20:537–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nokstad PH, Bakke SJ, Kjortansson O, van Krogh J (1986) Omnipaque vs. Hexabrix in intravenous DSA of the carotid arteries: Randomized double-blind crossover study. Am J Neuroradiology 7:303–304

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Michael A. Bettmann M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bettmann, M.A. The new contrast agents: A perspective. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 9, 173–175 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02577934

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02577934

Search

Navigation