Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of self-expanding polyethylene terephthalate and metallic stents implanted in porcine iliac arteries

  • Laboratory Investigations
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose:

Comparison of the biocompatibility of self-expanding polyethylene terephthalate (PET) stents with self-expanding metallic stents (Wallstents).

Methods:

Diameter- and length-matched PET stents and Wallstents were symmetrically implanted in the paired iliac arteries of 13 crossbred domestic swine. Stent deployment was studied angiographically and with intravascular ultrasound immediately after stent implantation. The angiographic stented lumen diameter was measured using quantitative vessel analysis before, immediately after stenting, and at 6-week follow-up. Cross-section histopathology and area morphometry were performed.

Results:

Immediately poststenting, intravascular ultrasound revealed proximal dislocation of 5 of the 13 PET stents, whereas all metal stents were firmly embedded at the implantation site. At 6-week follow-up, three of the remaining PET stents were totally or subtotally occluded by organized thrombus, whereas all metal stents were patent. Compared with immediately poststenting, the angiographic lumen diameter within the five remaining PET stents was reduced by 30%, and that of the metallic stents was virtually unaltered (p<0.02). This observation was confirmed by postmortem morphometry, wherein the PET-stented vessel segments a diameter stenosis of 40% was measured vs only 9% in the metallic stents (p<0.0001).

Conclusion:

PET-stent deployment is difficult to control due to the lack of radiopacity of this stent. PET stents seem to be more thrombogenic and lead to significantly more neointimal proliferation than metallic stents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bucx JJ, De Scheerder I, Beatt K, van den Brand M, Suryapranata H, de Feyter PJ, Serruys PW (1991) The importance of adequate anticoagulation to prevent early thrombosis after stenting of stenosed venous bypass grafts. Am Heart J 121(5):1389–1396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. de Feyter PJ, De Scheerder I, van den Brand M, Laarman GJ, Suryapranata H, Serruys PW (1990) Emergency stenting for refractory acute coronary artery occlusion during coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 66:1147–1150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Scheerder IK, Strauss BH, de Feyter PJ, Beatt KJ, Baur LHB, Wijns W, Heyndrix GR, Suryapranata H, van den Brand M, Buis B, Serruys PW (1992) Stenting in venous bypass grafts: A new treatment modality for patients who are poor candidates for reintervention. Am Heart J 123(4):1046–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Strauss BH, Serruys PW, De Scheerder IK, Tijssen JGP, Bertrand ME, Puel J, Meier B, Kaufmann U, Stauffer J-C, Rickards A, Sigwart U (1991) Relative risk analysis of angiographic predictors of restenosis within the coronary Wallstent. Circulation 84:1636–1643

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Burkel WE, Kahn RH (1982) Biocompatibility of prosthetic grafts. In: Stanley JH (ed): Biologic and synthetic vascular protheses. Gunn & Stratton, New York, pp 224–240

    Google Scholar 

  6. Murphy J, Schwarz R, Edwards W, Camrud A, Vlietstra R, Holmes D (1992) Percutaneous polymeric stents in porcine cornary arteries. Initial experience with polyethylene terephthalate stents. Circulation 86:1596–1604

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. De Scheerder I, Wilczek K, Verbeken E, Barios L, Piessens J, De Geest H (1995) Intraarterial biocompatibility of polyethylene terephthalate self-expandable stents implanted in porcine peripheral arteries. Acad Radiol 2:154–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van der Giessen W, Slager C, Gussenhoven E, Beusekom H, Huijts R, Schuurbiers J, Wilson R, Serruys PW, Verdouw P (1993) Mechanical features and in vivo imaging of a polymer stent. Int J Card Imaging 9:219–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barth K, Eicker B, Bittner U, Marhoff P (1989) The improvement of vessel quantification with image processing equipment for high resolution digital angiography. In: Lemke HV (ed). Computer-assisted radiology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 220–225

    Google Scholar 

  10. Galbraith JE, Murphy ML, Desoyza N (1981) Coronary angiogram interpretation: Interobserver variability. J Am Coll Cardiol 240:2053–2059

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fortin DF, Spero LA, Cusma JT, Santoro L, Burgess R, Bashore TM (1991) Pitfalls in the determination of absolute dimensions using angiographic catheters as calibration devices in quantitative angiography. Am J Cardiol 68:1176–1182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilczek, K., De Scheerder, I., Wang, K. et al. Comparison of self-expanding polyethylene terephthalate and metallic stents implanted in porcine iliac arteries. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 19, 176–180 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02577615

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02577615

Key words

Navigation