Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of experimental splenic autotransplantation and imipenem-cilastatin treatment in postsplenectomyPseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Research in Experimental Medicine

Abstract

Male Wistar albino rats were allocated to three groups—sham operated (n: 10), splenectomized (n: 20) and splenic autotransplanted (n: 10). Twelve weeks after operation, all were challenged with 1.8×108 cfu/mlPseudomonas aeruginosa intranasally. Half of the splenectomized rats received imipenem-cilastatin after 2 h of bacterial challenge. Mortality was then observed for the next 12 days. All animals were autopsied and liver, kidney, spleen and lung specimens were processed for microbiological culture and histopathological examination. In 80% of autotransplanted rats, splenic tissue regeneration was histopathologically verified. Hemoglobin oxidation of erythrocytes increased in splenectomized rats and remained close to control levels in the autotransplanted group. No significant difference was detected between IgM levels of splenectomized and autotransplanted groups. Mortality rates were the same for all groups, except that splenectomized animals given antimicrobial therapy had increased survival rates. In conclusion, it is likely that the spleen has no role in protection against pulmonary sepsis and that only appropriate antimicrobial therapy can protect the splenectomized host fromPseudomonas sepsis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson R, Benmark S (1989) Influence of splenectomy, partial splenectomy and splenic artery ligation onE. coli sepsis in rats. Acta Chir Scand 155:451–454

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bohnsack JF, Brown EJ (1986) The role of spleen in resistance to infection. Annu Rev Med 37:49–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Curtis CS, Aldridge MC, Biglin J, Dye J, Chodwick J, Dudley H (1988) Effect of splenectomy on Gram negative bacterial clearence in the presence and absence of sepsis. Br J Surg 75:177–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Emmerson AM (1990) Epidemiology of infection in intensive care unit. Int Care Med 16 [Suppl 13] 197–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eraklis AJ, Filler RM (1972) Splenectomy in childhood. A review of 1413 cases. J Pediatr Surg 7:382–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Feliciano DV, Spjut-Patrinely V, Burch JM (1990) Splenorrahpy: the alternative. Ann Surg 211:569–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Green JB, Shacford SR, Sise MJ, Ffridlund P (1986) Late septic complications in adults following splenectomy for trauma: a prospective analysis in 144 patients. J Trauma 26:999–1004

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Holdsworth RJ, Irving AD, Cuschieri A (1991) Postsplenectomy sepsis and its mortality rate: actual versus perceived risks. Br J Surg 78:1031–1038

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Inuma H, Okinaga K, Sato S, Tomioka M, Matsumoto K (1992) Optimal site and amount of splenic tissue for autotransplantation. J Surg Res 53:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jain SK (1988) Evidence for membrane lipid peroxidation during the in vivo aging of human erythrocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta 37:205–210

    Google Scholar 

  11. King H, Shumacker HB (1952) Susceptibility to infection after splenectomy performed in infancy. Ann Surg 136:239–242

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Livingston C, Levine B, Sirinek K (1983) Site of splenic autotransplantation affects protection from sepsis. Am J Surg 46:734–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maruyama A, Sekikawa T (1991) Immunologic function against infection in splenic autotransplanted mice. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 92:567–576

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Morales LC, Iglesias G, Bevia O, Ostos C, Martinez J, Abril J (1990) Liver, spleen and kidney cultures in different conditions of splenic preservation. Int Surg 75:215–219

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morris DH, Bullock FD (1919) The importance of the spleen in resistance to infection. Ann Surg 70:513–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Patel J, Williams J, Schmigel B (1981) Preservation of splenic function by autotransplantation of traumatized spleen in man. Surgery 90:683–688

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Scher K, Wrocznski F, Coil J (1982) The effect of Gram negative bacteremia. J Trauma 22:407–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shaw JH, Print CG (1989) Postsplenectomy sepsis. Br J Surg 76:1074–1081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Timens W, Leemans R (1991) Splenic autotransplantation and the immune system. Ann Surg 215:256–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. West KW, Grosfeld JL (1985) Postsplenectomy sepsis. Historical background and current concepts. World J Surg 9:477–483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Willfuhr KU, Westermann J, Pabst R (1992) Splenic autotransplantation provides protection against fatal sepsis in young but not in old rats. J Pediatr Surg 27:1207–1212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Winterbourn CC (1979) Heinz body formation in intact red blood cells. Br J Haematol 41:245–249

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zago M, Rosati R, Montorsi M, Fumagalli U, Torzilli G, Roviaro GC (1989) Segmental splenectomy. Usefulness of linear surgical staplers. Minerva Chir 44:2367–2371

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eskitürk, A., Söyletir, G., Peker, Ö. et al. The effects of experimental splenic autotransplantation and imipenem-cilastatin treatment in postsplenectomyPseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis. Res. Exp. Med. 195, 163–169 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02576785

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02576785

Key words

Navigation