Summary
In this brief note we present a correction of the Propositions 1 and 5 for proving the O(n) complexity of the algorithms described in [Dietrich et al. (1993)] for identifying maximal cliques and non-dominated covers from extensions of consecutive minimal covers and alternates implied by 0–1 knapsack constraints.
References
Dietrich, B.L., L.F. Escudero, A. Garín, G. Pérez (1993). O(n) procedures for identifying maximal cliques and non-dominated extensions of consecutive minimal covers and alternates.TOP 1, 139–160.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Muñoz, S. A correction of the justification of the Dietrich-escudero-garín-pérez O(n) procedures for identifying maximal cliques and non-dominated extensions of consecutive minimal covers and alternates. Top 3, 161–165 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02574809
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02574809