Skip to main content
Log in

How can representation theories of inverse semigroups and lattices be united?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Semigroup Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bredikhin, D.M.,Abstract characteristics of some relation algebras, in “Algebra and number's theory”, Nalchik,2 (1976), 3–19 (Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bredikhin, D. A.,Representation of inverse semigroups by difunctional multipermutations, Proc. of Conf. “Transformation semigroups”, Univ. of Essex, Colchester, (1993), 1–11.

  3. Garvadskii, V.S., ∩-semigroups of transformations, in “The theory of semigroups and its applications”, Saratov, (1970), 3–12 (Russian).

  4. Jónsson, B.,On the representation of lattices, Math. Scand.,1 (1953), 193–206.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Riguet, G.,Relations binaires, fermetures, correspondences de Galois, Bull. Soc. Math. France,76 (1948), 114–115.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Schein, B.M.,Multigroups, Journal of Algebra,111 (1987), 114–132.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by L. N. Shevrin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bredikhin, D.A. How can representation theories of inverse semigroups and lattices be united?. Semigroup Forum 53, 184–193 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02574133

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02574133

Keywords

Navigation